CGCV ranks 2nd and SAWG 8th of 10 funds in the US Active Low Volatility Category.
CGCV vs SAWG
CGCV −0.16pt a year
0.33%0.49%
CGCV 271.1×the volume
297K1.1K
CGCV vs SAWG Performance
+13.6%+8.3%
- CGCV 0.33%, better
- SAWG 0.49%
- CGCV $2.24B
- SAWG $3M
- CGCV +13.6%, better
- SAWG +8.3%
- CGCV 1.54%, better
- SAWG 0.25%
- CGCV 76
- SAWG 43
- CGCV 297K sh, better
- SAWG 1.1K sh
- CGCV $33.52
- SAWG $24.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CGCV | SAWG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A76Higher | C47 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B65Higher | F24 |
| Tradability | A71Higher | D30 |
| Holdings | B67Higher | D37 |
| Durability | A81Higher | F18 |
Rank among US Active Low Volatility funds
Same Category. CGCV and SAWG are both graded against the same 10 US Active Low Volatility funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CGCVA
SAWGD
In short
CGCV Capital Group's stock pickers took on a three-part job in one equity fund: current income, capital growth, and preservation of principal. Roughly 100 US names, actively chosen, priced under most defensive-equity rivals.
SAWG The name says growth; the mandate says brakes. An active fund aiming for market upside while emphasizing downside protection and lower volatility, which lands it among low-vol defensives rather than pure growth funds.
Stated mandate
CGCV The fund seeks to balance current income, capital growth, and preservation of principal.
SAWG The Fund seeks risk-adjusted returns with participation in market upside, while emphasizing downside protection and lower volatility.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CGCV vs SAWG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CGCV vs SAWG Cost
Overpaying SAWG vs CGCV
$3,055
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CGCV 0.33%
$6,737
SAWG 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CGCV | SAWG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $598 | $883 | $285 |
| 20 | $2,318 | $3,394 | $1,076 |
| 30 | $6,737 | $9,792 | $3,055 |
- 0.33%CGCV, cheaper
- 0.49%SAWG
- Middle half of US Active Low Volatility funds
- Median 0.47%
CGCV 3rd cheapest of 10 funds
SAWG 6th cheapest of 10 funds
CGCV vs SAWG Dividends
- CGCV 1.54%, better
- SAWG 0.25%
- CGCV $0.52
- SAWG $0.06
- CGCV $0.13
- SAWG $0.06
- CGCV Sep 30, 2026
- SAWG Dec 31, 2025
- CGCV Oct 1, 2026
- SAWG Jan 5, 2026
- CGCV Quarterly
- SAWG Irregular
Distribution history
CGCV vs SAWG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CGCV 10.1%SAWG 11.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- CGCV 1.06SAWG 0.66
- Worst fall
- CGCV −13.1%SAWG −18.7%
- Market sensitivity
- CGCV 0.67SAWG 0.95
Popular comparisons
- 0.33% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.