LQDW ranks 1st and OVM 12th of 25 funds in the Index Option Income Category.
LQDW vs OVM
LQDW −0.47pt a year
0.34%0.81%
LQDW 9.0×the volume
107K11.9K
OVM +1.6pt
+5.2%+6.8%
LQDW vs OVM Performance
+2.0%+2.2%
- LQDW 0.34%, better
- OVM 0.81%
- LQDW $353M
- OVM $45M
- LQDW +2.0%
- OVM +2.2%, better
- LQDW 12.38%, better
- OVM 5.79%
- LQDW 3192
- OVM 1
- LQDW 107K sh, better
- OVM 11.9K sh
- LQDW $22.87
- OVM $20.89
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LQDW | OVM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | C50 |
| Mission | A94 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | B61 |
| Tradability | A78Higher | C43 |
| Holdings | A100 | A100 |
| Durability | A82Higher | C53 |
Rank among Index Option Income funds
Same Category. LQDW and OVM are both graded against the same 25 Index Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LQDWA
OVMB
In short
LQDW Covered calls, but on bonds. LQDW owns iShares' flagship investment-grade corporate bond fund and writes monthly calls against it, paying distributions monthly, at less than half the option-income cohort's median fee.
OVM A muni bond core with an unusual income kicker: OVM writes short-dated S&P 500 put spreads on top of its bonds, so part of the payout comes from equity volatility rather than more duration or credit. Fee: 0.81%, no waiver.
Stated mandate
LQDW The fund seeks to track a strategy holding LQD while writing monthly covered calls to generate income.
OVM The Fund seeks total return. It is actively managed and invests through other ETFs or directly in their holdings to obtain exposure to investment-grade and below-investment-grade municipal bonds, while using listed short-term put options to generate income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LQDW vs OVM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LQDW vs OVM Cost
Overpaying OVM vs LQDW
$8,586
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LQDW 0.34%
$6,932
OVM 0.81%
$15,518
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LQDW | OVM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $616 | $1,439 | $823 |
| 20 | $2,386 | $5,456 | $3,070 |
| 30 | $6,932 | $15,518 | $8,586 |
- 0.34%LQDW, cheaper
- 0.81%OVM
- Middle half of Index Option Income funds
- Median 0.81%
LQDW cheapest of 25 funds
OVM 13th cheapest of 25 funds
LQDW vs OVM Dividends
- LQDW 12.38%, better
- OVM 5.79%
- LQDW $2.83
- OVM $1.21
- LQDW $0.38
- OVM $0.09
- LQDW Oct 2, 2026
- OVM Oct 28, 2026
- LQDW Oct 7, 2026
- OVM Oct 29, 2026
- LQDW Monthly
- OVM Monthly
Distribution history
LQDW vs OVM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LQDW 4.2%, betterOVM 7.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- LQDW 0.16OVM 0.33, better
- Worst fall
- LQDW −9.2%OVM −15.6%
- Market sensitivity
- LQDW 0.59OVM 1.24
LQDW and OVM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.34% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
