XHLF ranks 4th and LQID 75th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
LQID vs XHLF
XHLF −0.32pt a year
0.35%0.03%
XHLF 22.7×the volume
13.6K309K
LQID vs XHLF Performance
+0.5%+0.9%
- LQID 0.35%
- XHLF 0.03%, better
- LQID $13M
- XHLF $2.03B
- LQID
- XHLF +3.6%
- LQID
- XHLF 3.75%
- LQID 32
- XHLF 29
- LQID 13.6K sh
- XHLF 309K sh, better
- LQID $24.81
- XHLF $50.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LQID | XHLF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F6 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | D32 | C47Higher |
| Tradability | F14 | A79Higher |
| Holdings | C47Higher | D35 |
| Durability | F9 | B59Higher |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. LQID and XHLF are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LQIDF
XHLFA
In short
LQID An active take on parked cash: it reaches past plain T-bills into short-maturity credit, including dollar-denominated foreign paper, seeking extra income. Fee is 0.35% net of a waiver through May 31, 2027 (0.45% gross).
XHLF Most cash-parking funds pick a maturity bucket. XHLF picks a number: it blends Treasury bills to an average duration of about six months, resets to that target monthly, and charges three basis points to do it.
Stated mandate
LQID The Fund seeks current income. The issuer describes LQID as an enhanced fixed-income strategy intended for short-term liquid allocation and enhanced yield.
XHLF The Fund seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. Treasury securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LQID vs XHLF Holdings
How LQID and XHLF differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
- Country87.2%
Sector
No Sector split for LQID and XHLF.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in LQIDMore in XHLF | LQID | XHLF |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | XHLF +12.8 points | 87.2% | 100.0% |
| Japan | LQID +3.0 points | 3.0% | 0.0% |
| Switzerland | LQID +1.6 points | 1.6% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | LQID +1.6 points | 1.6% | 0.0% |
| Spain | LQID +1.6 points | 1.6% | 0.0% |
| Canada | LQID +1.5 points | 1.5% | 0.0% |
| France | LQID +1.5 points | 1.5% | 0.0% |
| Netherlands | LQID +1.4 points | 1.4% | 0.0% |
| Norway | LQID +0.8 points | 0.8% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- LQID74.6%
- XHLF79.1%
- LQID31
- XHLF29
Asset class
- LQID
- Fixed Income
- XHLF
- Fixed Income
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. LQID holds 31 securities, XHLF 29.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LQID vs XHLF Cost
Overpaying LQID vs XHLF
$6,488
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LQID 0.35%
$7,126
XHLF 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LQID | XHLF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $55 | $579 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $216 | $2,238 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $638 | $6,488 |
- 0.35%LQID
- 0.03%XHLF, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
XHLF cheapest of 78 funds
LQID 72nd cheapest of 78 funds
LQID vs XHLF Dividends
- LQID
- XHLF 3.75%
- LQID
- XHLF $1.89
- LQID $0.11
- XHLF $0.15
- LQID Oct 21, 2026
- XHLF Oct 1, 2026
- LQID Oct 22, 2026
- XHLF Oct 6, 2026
- LQID Monthly
- XHLF Monthly
Distribution history
LQID vs XHLF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LQID XHLF 0.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- LQID XHLF −0.52
- Worst fall
- LQID XHLF −0.1%
- Market sensitivity
- LQID −0.01XHLF 0.03
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.