Skip to content
etf.net

LRCU vs PANG

Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF

LRCUCCboe

Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF

PANGANasdaq

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

PANG −0.54pt a year

LRCU1.30%PANG0.76%

Avg volume · 30D

LRCU 2.6×the volume

LRCU115KPANG44.6K

LRCU vs PANG Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+38.0%LRCU+91.6%PANG

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. LRCU +38.0%. PANG +91.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.200%300%400%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
LRCU 1.30%
PANG 0.76%, better
Fund size
LRCU $33M
PANG $9M
1Y total return
LRCU +38.0%
PANG +91.6%, better
Holdings
LRCU 1
PANG 4
Avg volume (30D)
LRCU 115K sh, better
PANG 44.6K sh
NAV per share
LRCU $27.70
PANG $31.31
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LRCU: Cost 32, Risk 66, Mission not scored, Tradability 74, Holdings not scored, Durability 66. PANG: Cost 70, Risk 74, Mission 94, Tradability 74, Holdings not scored, Durability 59.
Pillar letters and Scores for LRCU, PANG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLRCUPANG
Cost30% weightD32A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA94
Risk15% weightB66A74Higher
Tradability15% weightA74A74
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB66HigherB59

Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LRCU and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Single-Stock Long Leveraged⁠

Category · 315 funds
See all 315 ›

PANG ranks 3rd and LRCU 78th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.

  1. Rank 1ATSMGLeverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETFScore 73
  2. Rank 2AUNHGLeverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETFScore 72
  3. Rank 3AOKTGLeverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 3APANGLeverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETFScore 70
  5. Rank 5BAMDGLeverage Shares 2x Long AMD Daily ETFScore 69
  6. Rank 78CBTCUDirexion Daily Bitcoin Bull 2X ETFScore 52
  7. Rank 78CLRCUTradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETFScore 52
  8. Rank 78CQCMUDirexion Daily QCOM Bull 2X ETFScore 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LRCUCTradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF

PANGALeverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF

In short

LRCU No data

PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.

Stated mandate

LRCU No data

PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.

Why people hold it

LRCU No data

  • PANG Cheaper of the two 2x PANW funds: 0.76% flat versus 1.08% for PALU, and PALU's number is net of a waiver through September 1, 2027 (1.48% gross).direxion.com
  • That 0.76% also sits below the typical fee in the single-stock leveraged category, where costs usually run higher.
  • Hits its 200% daily target closely, one of the tighter implementations among hundreds of single-stock leveraged funds.
  • Leverage arrives inside a standard 1940 Act ETF: no margin agreement, no borrowing, no overnight position to roll yourself.leverageshares.com

Worth knowing

LRCU No data

  • PANG Daily reset, not a 2x hold. Over weeks the returns compound, and a choppy stretch in PANW can leave the result far from double the move.leverageshares.com
  • One stock, twice the swing. An earnings miss or a cyber headline lands here with double the force, up or down.leverageshares.com
  • Smaller and more lightly traded than the giants of the category, so spreads can widen; limit orders earn their keep.

Full LRCU profile⁠

Full PANG profile⁠

LRCU vs PANG Holdings

How LRCU and PANG differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of LRCU and 0.0% of PANG.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

No Sector split for LRCU and PANG.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in LRCU and PANG, widest gap first
CountryMore in LRCUMore in PANG
United StatesSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • LRCU133.1%
  • PANG208.4%

Securities held

  • LRCU1
  • PANG1

Asset class

LRCU
Equity
PANG
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in LRCU1
  • In both0
  • Only in PANG1

Only in LRCU

1 security, 100% of LRCU by weight

  • Cashusd133.10%

Only in PANG

1 security, 8.4% of PANG by weight

  • First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/20408.43%

Weight gaps

LRCU and PANG share no securities.

All 3 LRCU holdings⁠All 4 PANG holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LRCU vs PANG Cost

Overpaying LRCU vs PANG

$8,713

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LRCU 1.30%

    $23,369

  • PANG 0.76%

    $14,656

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LRCU 1.30%
  • PANG 0.76%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K$25K051015202530LRCU $23,369PANG $14,656

Year by year

YearLRCUPANGOverpaying
10$2,263$1,353$910
20$8,393$5,142$3,251
30$23,369$14,656$8,713

Expense ratio

  • 1.30%LRCU
  • 0.76%PANG, cheaper
  • Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
  • Median 0.97%

PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds

LRCU 229th cheapest of 315 funds

LRCU vs PANG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
LRCU None
PANG No data
Last payment
LRCU No data
PANG $1.30
Ex-dividend
LRCU No data
PANG Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
LRCU No data
PANG Jan 2, 2026
Frequency
LRCU No data
PANG Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

LRCUAll LRCU payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PANGIrregular · 1 paymentAll PANG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $1.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12026YTD

LRCU vs PANG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LRCU 151.0%since Sep 2025PANG 128.2%since Apr 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LRCU 1.39since Sep 2025PANG 0.90since Apr 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LRCU −76.9%since Aug 2025PANG −62.4%since Mar 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LRCU 4.51PANG 3.32

LRCU and PANG in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • LRCUCvsTSMGA

    Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.30% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PANGAvsTSMGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.76% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRCUCvsUNHGA

    Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.30% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PANGAvsUNHGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.76% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRCUCvsOKTGA

    Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.30% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PANGAvsOKTGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.76% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.