VONV ranks 1st and LRGF 5th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
LRGF vs VONV
VONV −0.02pt a year
0.08%0.06%
VONV 4.5×the volume
172K774K
LRGF +1.8pt
+14.0%+12.2%
LRGF vs VONV Performance
+82.7%+72.9%
- LRGF 0.08%
- VONV 0.06%, better
- LRGF $3.65B
- VONV $23.3B
- LRGF +10.5%
- VONV +28.9%, better
- LRGF 1.08%
- VONV 1.53%, better
- LRGF 305
- VONV 887
- LRGF 172K sh
- VONV 774K sh, better
- LRGF $76.99
- VONV $113.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LRGF | VONV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A93 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C54 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | A77Higher | B60 |
| Holdings | D39 | C49Higher |
| Durability | A86 | A93Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. LRGF and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LRGFA
VONVA
In short
LRGF Four factor tilts (value, quality, momentum, low volatility) blended into one roughly 300-stock U.S. portfolio, priced at 0.08%: a fraction of what the typical multifactor fund charges.
VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.
Stated mandate
LRGF The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. stocks selected through value, quality, momentum, low-volatility, and size factors. It is positioned as a diversified core U.S. equity portfolio using a multifactor strategy.
VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LRGF vs VONV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LRGF vs VONV Cost
Overpaying LRGF vs VONV
$419
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LRGF 0.08%
$1,689
VONV 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LRGF | VONV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $110 | $37 |
| 20 | $575 | $432 | $143 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $1,270 | $419 |
- 0.08%LRGF
- 0.06%VONV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
LRGF 6th cheapest of 99 funds
LRGF vs VONV Dividends
- LRGF 1.08%
- VONV 1.53%, better
- LRGF $0.83
- VONV $1.74
- LRGF $0.20
- VONV $0.42
- LRGF Sep 15, 2026
- VONV Sep 23, 2026
- LRGF Sep 18, 2026
- VONV Sep 25, 2026
- LRGF Quarterly
- VONV Quarterly
Distribution history
LRGF vs VONV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- LRGF
- VONV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LRGF 12.5%VONV 12.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- LRGF 1.43VONV 1.43Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- LRGF −21.6%VONV −18.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- LRGF 0.99VONV 0.85
LRGF and VONV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


