Skip to content

LRGF vs VONV

iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF

LRGFANYSE Arca

Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

VONVANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

VONV −0.02pt a year

LRGF0.08%VONV0.06%

Avg volume · 30D

VONV 4.5×the volume

LRGF172KVONV774K

10Y return · a year

LRGF +1.8pt

LRGF+14.0%VONV+12.2%

LRGF vs VONV Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+82.7%LRGF+72.9%VONV

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. LRGF +82.7%. VONV +72.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
LRGF 0.08%
VONV 0.06%, better
Fund size
LRGF $3.65B
VONV $23.3B
1Y total return
LRGF +10.5%
VONV +28.9%, better
Yield (12M)
LRGF 1.08%
VONV 1.53%, better
Holdings
LRGF 305
VONV 887
Avg volume (30D)
LRGF 172K sh
VONV 774K sh, better
NAV per share
LRGF $76.99
VONV $113.44
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LRGF: Cost 95, Risk 54, Mission 93, Tradability 77, Holdings 39, Durability 86. VONV: Cost 96, Risk 86, Mission 100, Tradability 60, Holdings 49, Durability 93.
Pillar letters and Scores for LRGF, VONV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLRGFVONV
Cost30% weightA95A96Higher
Mission25% weightA93A100Higher
Risk15% weightC54A86Higher
Tradability15% weightA77HigherB60
Holdings10% weightD39C49Higher
Durability5% weightA86A93Higher

Rank among US Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LRGF and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Multifactor⁠

Category · 99 funds
See all 99 ›

VONV ranks 1st and LRGF 5th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 1AVONVVanguard Russell 1000 Value ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AILCViShares Morningstar Value ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 5AIUSGiShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETFScore 79
  4. Rank 5ALRGFiShares U.S. Equity Factor ETFScore 79
  5. Rank 5AQUSState Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETFScore 79

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LRGFAiShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF

VONVAVanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

In short

LRGF Four factor tilts (value, quality, momentum, low volatility) blended into one roughly 300-stock U.S. portfolio, priced at 0.08%: a fraction of what the typical multifactor fund charges.

VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.

Stated mandate

LRGF The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. stocks selected through value, quality, momentum, low-volatility, and size factors. It is positioned as a diversified core U.S. equity portfolio using a multifactor strategy.

VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.

Why people hold it

  • LRGF Charges 0.08% a year against a 0.32% median for multifactor peers. Factor machinery at close to plain index-fund pricing.
  • One ticker, four screens: value, quality, momentum and low volatility, spread across about 300 U.S. stocks instead of a single-factor bet.ishares.com
  • Live since 2015 and now a multi-billion-dollar iShares fund that pays quarterly. This strategy has been through real market cycles, not a backtest.
  • Stands in the top quartile of a 107-fund multifactor cohort, one of the stronger implementations in a very crowded field.
  • VONV 0.06% a year, a fraction of the typical fee among factor ETFs. On a rules-based value index there is little room for cleverness, so cost does most of the work.vanguard.com
  • Full replication, not sampling: it owns the index's roughly 900 names and has stayed tightly aligned with the Russell 1000 Value benchmark since launching in 2010.
  • Same Russell benchmark as pricier rivals for less: the Goldman MarketBeta version (GVUS) charges 0.12% to track the identical value index.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, among the easiest in its group to get in and out of, and it distributes quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • LRGF Blending four factors can mute any single one, and the mix can drift from a plain cap-weighted large-cap index in either direction.
  • Straight-style peers go cheaper still: IUSG and VYM run at 0.04%. The factor engineering carries a small premium over vanilla exposure.
  • Moderately traded rather than one of the category's most active names, so order size and timing matter more than with the largest core funds.
  • VONV One screen, one style. Value only, with no quality or momentum overlay, so the ride follows the value side of the market wherever it goes.vanguard.com
  • This is the entire value bucket, not a best-ideas portfolio. About 900 holdings means results hug the large-cap value category rather than stray from it.
  • Cheaper exists nearby: Vanguard's VYM charges 0.04%, but it screens for dividend yield, a different portfolio than a Russell value index.

Full LRGF profile⁠

Full VONV profile⁠

LRGF vs VONV Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LRGF vs VONV Cost

Overpaying LRGF vs VONV

$419

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LRGF 0.08%

    $1,689

  • VONV 0.06%

    $1,270

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LRGF 0.08%
  • VONV 0.06%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$500$1K$1.5K$2K051015202530LRGF $1,689VONV $1,270

Year by year

YearLRGFVONVOverpaying
10$147$110$37
20$575$432$143
30$1,689$1,270$419

Expense ratio

  • 0.08%LRGF
  • 0.06%VONV, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.29%

VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds

LRGF 6th cheapest of 99 funds

LRGF vs VONV Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
LRGF 1.08%
VONV 1.53%, better
Payout (12M)
LRGF $0.83
VONV $1.74
Last payment
LRGF $0.20
VONV $0.42
Ex-dividend
LRGF Sep 15, 2026
VONV Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
LRGF Sep 18, 2026
VONV Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
LRGF Quarterly
VONV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

LRGFQuarterly · 40 paymentsAll LRGF payments⁠
One bar per payment. 40 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.12; Jun 27, 2017 $0.12; Sep 26, 2017 $0.14; Dec 21, 2017 $0.16; Mar 22, 2018 $0.12; Jun 26, 2018 $0.13; Sep 26, 2018 $0.12; Dec 17, 2018 $0.17; Dec 28, 2018 $0.37; Mar 20, 2019 $0.12; Jun 17, 2019 $0.14; Sep 24, 2019 $0.18; Dec 16, 2019 $0.18; Mar 25, 2020 $0.15; Jun 15, 2020 $0.14; Sep 23, 2020 $0.13; Dec 14, 2020 $0.10; Mar 25, 2021 $0.10; Jun 10, 2021 $0.09; Sep 24, 2021 $0.13; Dec 13, 2021 $0.17; Mar 24, 2022 $0.17; Jun 9, 2022 $0.15; Sep 26, 2022 $0.20; Dec 13, 2022 $0.18; Mar 23, 2023 $0.18; Jun 7, 2023 $0.15; Sep 26, 2023 $0.19; Dec 20, 2023 $0.20; Mar 21, 2024 $0.17; Jun 11, 2024 $0.15; Sep 25, 2024 $0.22; Dec 17, 2024 $0.20; Mar 18, 2025 $0.17; Jun 16, 2025 $0.19; Sep 16, 2025 $0.20; Dec 16, 2025 $0.25; Mar 17, 2026 $0.18; Jun 15, 2026 $0.19; Sep 15, 2026 $0.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
VONVQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll VONV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.21; Jun 28, 2017 $0.29; Sep 27, 2017 $0.34; Dec 14, 2017 $0.34; Mar 22, 2018 $0.24; Jun 28, 2018 $0.32; Sep 26, 2018 $0.33; Dec 13, 2018 $0.35; Mar 25, 2019 $0.29; Jun 21, 2019 $0.32; Sep 26, 2019 $0.38; Dec 16, 2019 $0.39; Mar 26, 2020 $0.36; Jun 25, 2020 $0.32; Sep 11, 2020 $0.28; Dec 17, 2020 $0.39; Mar 26, 2021 $0.26; Jun 29, 2021 $0.27; Sep 29, 2021 $0.33; Dec 16, 2021 $0.37; Mar 24, 2022 $0.30; Jun 29, 2022 $0.37; Sep 28, 2022 $0.38; Dec 15, 2022 $0.42; Mar 23, 2023 $0.32; Jun 23, 2023 $0.35; Sep 21, 2023 $0.39; Dec 19, 2023 $0.46; Mar 21, 2024 $0.33; Jun 27, 2024 $0.39; Sep 26, 2024 $0.44; Dec 23, 2024 $0.44; Mar 25, 2025 $0.38; Jun 20, 2025 $0.40; Sep 24, 2025 $0.40; Dec 22, 2025 $0.49; Mar 24, 2026 $0.41; Jun 18, 2026 $0.41; Sep 23, 2026 $0.42. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

LRGF vs VONV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • LRGF
  • VONV
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: LRGF −21.6% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LRGF 12.5%VONV 12.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LRGF 1.43VONV 1.43Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LRGF −21.6%VONV −18.9%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LRGF 0.99VONV 0.85

LRGF and VONV in the news

Popular comparisons

  • LRGFAvsILCVA

    iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VONVAvsILCVA

    Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGFAvsVYMA

    iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF · Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VONVAvsVYMA

    Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF · Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGFAvsIMCVA

    iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VONVAvsIMCVA

    Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.