QALT ranks 4th and LSEQ 22nd of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.
LSEQ vs QALT
QALT −1.48pt a year
2.28%0.80%
QALT 10.5×the volume
1.69K17.7K
LSEQ vs QALT Performance
+23.6%+6.6%
- LSEQ 2.28%
- QALT 0.80%, better
- LSEQ $17M
- QALT $195M
- LSEQ +23.6%, better
- QALT +6.6%
- LSEQ 108
- QALT 26
- LSEQ 1.69K sh
- QALT 17.7K sh, better
- LSEQ $34.63
- QALT $25.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LSEQ | QALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F14 | A90Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C50 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | C41 | B57Higher |
| Holdings | C54 | |
| Durability | B61 | B65Higher |
Rank among Alternative Strategies funds
Same Category. LSEQ and QALT are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LSEQD
QALTA
In short
LSEQ A hedge fund playbook in an ETF shell: LSEQ buys the large and mid caps it likes and shorts the ones it doesn't, keeping net long exposure usually between 40% and 60%. Roughly half-invested by design, with room to stretch to 150% long.
QALT One ticker, several hedge fund playbooks: SEI stacks sub-advisers running directional, event-driven and arbitrage strategies, and measures itself against 3-month T-bills instead of the S&P 500. It undercuts the typical alternatives fund on fees.
Stated mandate
LSEQ The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital through long and short positions in equity securities. It generally maintains net long exposure of 40% to 60%, with exposure occasionally reaching 150% long.
QALT The fund seeks positive absolute returns across market cycles with reduced correlation to stocks and bonds. It pursues this through multiple underlying funds and sub-advisers using directional or tactical, event-driven, and arbitrage approaches.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LSEQ vs QALT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LSEQ vs QALT Cost
Overpaying LSEQ vs QALT
$20,884
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LSEQ 2.28%
$36,230
QALT 0.80%
$15,346
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LSEQ | QALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $3,812 | $1,422 | $2,390 |
| 20 | $13,544 | $5,393 | $8,151 |
| 30 | $36,230 | $15,346 | $20,884 |
- 2.28%LSEQ
- 0.80%QALT, cheaper
- Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
- Median 1.13%
QALT 4th cheapest of 29 funds
LSEQ 25th cheapest of 29 funds
LSEQ vs QALT Dividends
- LSEQ $0.61
- QALT $0.17
- LSEQ Dec 19, 2025
- QALT Oct 5, 2026
- LSEQ Dec 24, 2025
- QALT Oct 6, 2026
- LSEQ Irregular
- QALT Quarterly
Distribution history
LSEQ vs QALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LSEQ 14.4%QALT 7.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- LSEQ 0.73QALT 0.77
- Worst fall
- LSEQ −10.9%QALT −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- LSEQ 0.34QALT 0.24
Popular comparisons
- 2.28% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.28% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.28% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.