UNHG ranks 2nd and METU 37th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
METU vs UNHG
UNHG −0.25pt a year
1.02%0.77%
METU 8.1×the volume
5.85M726K
METU vs UNHG Performance
−31.1%+11.9%
- METU 1.02%
- UNHG 0.77%, better
- METU $373M
- UNHG $63M
- METU −31.1%
- UNHG +11.9%, better
- METU 3.84%
- UNHG
- METU 10
- UNHG 5
- METU 5.85M sh, better
- UNHG 726K sh
- METU $22.25
- UNHG $20.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | METU | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C44 | B60Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A90 |
| Risk | A71 | A83Higher |
| Tradability | A75 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A86Higher | B66 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. METU and UNHG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
METUB
UNHGA
In short
METU Meta Platforms at double speed: METU aims for 200% of the stock's daily move, then resets every night. It's one of only two US ETFs built on that trade, and one of the busiest names in the leveraged single-stock aisle.
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
METU The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of Meta Platforms, Inc. common shares.
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
METU vs UNHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
METU vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying METU vs UNHG
$4,183
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
METU 1.02%
$19,012
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | METU | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,797 | $1,371 | $426 |
| 20 | $6,746 | $5,205 | $1,541 |
| 30 | $19,012 | $14,829 | $4,183 |
- 1.02%METU
- 0.77%UNHG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
METU 199th cheapest of 315 funds
METU vs UNHG Dividends
- METU 3.84%
- UNHG
- METU $0.83
- UNHG
- METU $0.17
- UNHG $1.90
- METU Sep 22, 2026
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- METU Sep 29, 2026
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- METU Quarterly
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
METU vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- METU 73.1%UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- METU 0.17UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- METU −63.9%UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- METU 3.23UNHG 5.53
Popular comparisons
- 1.02% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.