PANG ranks 3rd and METU 37th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
METU vs PANG
PANG −0.26pt a year
1.02%0.76%
METU 131.2×the volume
5.85M44.6K
METU vs PANG Performance
−31.1%+91.6%
- METU 1.02%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- METU $373M
- PANG $9M
- METU −31.1%
- PANG +91.6%, better
- METU 3.84%
- PANG
- METU 10
- PANG 4
- METU 5.85M sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- METU $22.25
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | METU | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C44 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A94 |
| Risk | A71 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | A75Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A86Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. METU and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
METUB
PANGA
In short
METU Meta Platforms at double speed: METU aims for 200% of the stock's daily move, then resets every night. It's one of only two US ETFs built on that trade, and one of the busiest names in the leveraged single-stock aisle.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
METU The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of Meta Platforms, Inc. common shares.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
METU vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
METU vs PANG Cost
Overpaying METU vs PANG
$4,356
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
METU 1.02%
$19,012
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | METU | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,797 | $1,353 | $444 |
| 20 | $6,746 | $5,142 | $1,604 |
| 30 | $19,012 | $14,656 | $4,356 |
- 1.02%METU
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
METU 199th cheapest of 315 funds
METU vs PANG Dividends
- METU 3.84%
- PANG
- METU $0.83
- PANG
- METU $0.17
- PANG $1.30
- METU Sep 22, 2026
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- METU Sep 29, 2026
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- METU Quarterly
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
METU vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- METU 73.1%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- METU 0.17PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- METU −63.9%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- METU 3.23PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 1.02% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.