METV ranks 4th and SNSR 5th of 6 funds in the Metaverse & Connectivity Category.
METV vs SNSR
METV −0.09pt a year
0.59%0.68%
METV 3.1×the volume
48.8K15.9K
METV +0.5pt
+5.3%+4.8%
METV vs SNSR Performance
+29.7%+26.4%
- METV 0.59%, better
- SNSR 0.68%
- METV $209M
- SNSR $196M
- METV −4.5%
- SNSR +21.2%, better
- METV 0.17%
- SNSR 0.49%, better
- METV 31
- SNSR 72
- METV 48.8K sh, better
- SNSR 15.9K sh
- METV $19.91
- SNSR $46.46
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | METV | SNSR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B57Higher | C40 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D34 | D37Higher |
| Tradability | C53 | B56Higher |
| Holdings | D37 | C52Higher |
| Durability | B58 | B69Higher |
Rank among Metaverse & Connectivity funds
Same Category. METV and SNSR are both graded against the same 6 Metaverse & Connectivity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
METVC
SNSRC
In short
METV Launched in 2021 with an index built by Matthew Ball's research group, METV is the metaverse theme in its original form: roughly 50 globally listed companies spanning chips, networks, virtual worlds and payments.
SNSR The ticker is the thesis: sensors. SNSR has tracked a single Internet of Things index since 2016, buying the roughly 70 developed-market names that build the chips, sensors and connected hardware behind smart everything.
Stated mandate
METV The fund seeks to track the Ball Metaverse Index before fees and expenses by investing primarily in globally listed companies whose activities, products, services, or technologies enable the Metaverse.
SNSR The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Indxx Global Internet of Things Thematic Index. It invests at least 80% of assets in securities represented by that index and targets companies facilitating the Internet of Things.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
METV vs SNSR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
METV vs SNSR Cost
Overpaying SNSR vs METV
$1,617
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
METV 0.59%
$11,635
SNSR 0.68%
$13,252
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | METV | SNSR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $1,215 | $157 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $4,633 | $582 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $13,252 | $1,617 |
- 0.59%METV, cheaper
- 0.68%SNSR
- Middle half of Metaverse & Connectivity funds
- Median 0.64%
METV 3rd cheapest of 6 funds
SNSR 4th cheapest of 6 funds
METV vs SNSR Dividends
- METV 0.17%
- SNSR 0.49%, better
- METV $0.03
- SNSR $0.23
- METV $0.03
- SNSR $0.08
- METV Dec 30, 2025
- SNSR Jun 29, 2026
- METV Dec 31, 2025
- SNSR Jul 7, 2026
- METV Irregular
- SNSR Twice a year
Distribution history
METV vs SNSR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- METV
- SNSR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- METV 21.8%, betterSNSR 22.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- METV 1.06, betterSNSR 0.68
- Worst fall
- METV −59.6%SNSR −38.0%, better
- Market sensitivity
- METV 1.39SNSR 1.68
METV and SNSR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
