VCRM ranks 4th and MINO 25th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
MINO vs VCRM
VCRM −0.27pt a year
0.39%0.12%
VCRM 2.5×the volume
274K679K
MINO vs VCRM Performance
+0.2%+1.1%
- MINO 0.39%
- VCRM 0.12%, better
- MINO $765M
- VCRM $2.2B
- MINO +0.2%
- VCRM +1.1%, better
- MINO 3.99%, better
- VCRM 3.81%
- MINO 591
- VCRM 2588
- MINO 274K sh
- VCRM 679K sh, better
- MINO $43.91
- VCRM $73.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MINO | VCRM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A98 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B62 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | A78 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | B64 | A81Higher |
| Durability | B64 | A74Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. MINO and VCRM are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MINOB
VCRMA
In short
MINO An actively run muni fund from PIMCO's credit desk: federally tax-free income hunted across the whole ratings ladder, with room for up to 30% junk munis. Most big muni ETFs simply track an index. This one shops.
VCRM Vanguard's active answer in a mostly-index category: managers working the whole muni curve for 0.12% a year, under half the muni ETF median fee. Monthly income, exempt from federal personal income taxes.
Stated mandate
MINO The Fund seeks current income exempt from federal income tax and long-term capital appreciation.
VCRM The fund seeks total return through current income exempt from federal personal income taxes and capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MINO vs VCRM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MINO vs VCRM Cost
Overpaying MINO vs VCRM
$5,378
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MINO 0.39%
$7,898
VCRM 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MINO | VCRM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $220 | $485 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $859 | $1,866 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $2,520 | $5,378 |
- 0.39%MINO
- 0.12%VCRM, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
VCRM 8th cheapest of 63 funds
MINO 47th cheapest of 63 funds
MINO vs VCRM Dividends
- MINO 3.99%, better
- VCRM 3.81%
- MINO $1.76
- VCRM $2.82
- MINO $0.14
- VCRM $0.21
- MINO Oct 1, 2026
- VCRM Oct 1, 2026
- MINO Oct 5, 2026
- VCRM Oct 5, 2026
- MINO Monthly
- VCRM Monthly
Distribution history
MINO vs VCRM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MINO 6.2%VCRM 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- MINO 0.19VCRM −0.32
- Worst fall
- MINO −15.2%VCRM −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- MINO 0.96VCRM 0.17
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.