Skip to content

MLPX vs PXJ

Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF

MLPXBNYSE Arca

Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF

PXJCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

MLPX −0.18pt a year

MLPX0.45%PXJ0.63%

Avg volume · 30D

MLPX 6.4×the volume

MLPX375KPXJ58.6K

10Y return · a year

MLPX +11.0pt

MLPX+12.1%PXJ+1.1%

MLPX vs PXJ Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+158.3%MLPX+186.8%PXJ

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. MLPX +158.3%. PXJ +186.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%50%100%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
MLPX 0.45%, better
PXJ 0.63%
Fund size
MLPX $3.8B
PXJ $139M
1Y total return
MLPX +36.7%
PXJ +62.4%, better
Yield (12M)
MLPX 4.01%, better
PXJ 2.63%
Holdings
MLPX 30
PXJ 33
Avg volume (30D)
MLPX 375K sh, better
PXJ 58.6K sh
NAV per share
MLPX $76.71
PXJ $46.96
52W range

ETF.net Grade

MLPX: Cost 71, Risk 65, Mission 32, Tradability 66, Holdings 44, Durability 71. PXJ: Cost 45, Risk 46, Mission not scored, Tradability 58, Holdings 73, Durability 55.
Pillar letters and Scores for MLPX, PXJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarMLPXPXJ
Cost30% weightA71HigherC45
Mission25% weightD32Not scored
Risk15% weightB65HigherC46
Tradability15% weightB66HigherB58
Holdings10% weightC44A73Higher
Durability5% weightA71HigherB55

Rank among Energy Sector funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. MLPX and PXJ are both graded against the same 7 Energy Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Energy Sector⁠

Category · 7 funds
See all 7 ›

MLPX ranks 2nd and PXJ 4th of 7 funds in the Energy Sector Category.

  1. Rank 1BXESState Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETFScore 61
  2. Rank 2BMLPXGlobal X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETFScore 56
  3. Rank 3CTMLPTortoise MLP ETFScore 53
  4. Rank 4CPXJInvesco Oil & Gas Services ETFScore 52
  5. Rank 5CMDSTWestwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETFScore 43

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

MLPXBGlobal X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF

PXJCInvesco Oil & Gas Services ETF

In short

MLPX A focused bet on the toll roads of American energy: roughly 30 pipeline and infrastructure names tracking the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index, running since 2013 at 0.45% a year.

PXJ Oilfield services run through a quant filter: PXJ's index ranks drillers, equipment makers and service firms on momentum, quality and value, then holds about 30. Trading since 2005, at 0.63% net of a waiver through August 31, 2028.

Stated mandate

MLPX The fund seeks to provide investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the price and yield performance of the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index.

PXJ The Fund tracks the Dynamic Oil Services Intellidex Index by normally investing at least 90% of total assets in its constituent common stocks. The index targets 30 U.S. companies supporting oil and gas production, processing, and distribution.

Why people hold it

  • MLPX 0.45% a year, against a peer-group median near 0.79% for energy sector ETFs. Cheap shelf space for a narrow corner of the market.
  • Concentrated on purpose: around 30 pipeline and energy infrastructure names via the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index, so the midstream theme isn't watered down.
  • Trading since 2013 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund with steady volume, which tends to keep spreads manageable on retail-size orders.
  • Distributions land on a quarterly schedule, so the payout rhythm is predictable even as the amounts move with the underlying cash flows.
  • PXJ Not a cap-weighted mirror. The index scores candidates on price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action and value, then reconstitutes four times a year.invesco.com
  • Weight spreads across size tiers rather than piling into the biggest service names, leaving more room for mid- and small-cap drillers than a cap-weighted build.sec.gov
  • Listed in 2005, it has traded through multiple drilling booms and busts, holding about 30 US companies that support oil and gas production, processing and distribution.

Worth knowing

  • MLPX One sector, one theme. Energy infrastructure rides commodity cycles and rate moves, so it can travel well out of step with a broad market fund.
  • With around 30 holdings, individual pipeline operators carry real weight and one company's news can move the whole fund.
  • Not the cheapest ticket in the cohort: XES charges 0.35%, though it buys oil services companies rather than midstream infrastructure.
  • PXJ 0.63% net of a waiver through August 31, 2028, near the energy-sector median. Gross is 0.77%, so the cost steps up if that waiver is not extended.
  • Cheaper routes into the niche exist: XES charges 0.35%, with no waiver attached. The quant screen is what the difference buys.
  • About 30 stocks in one cyclical industry, tracking drilling and completion budgets more than the broad energy complex, with moderate volume rather than mega-fund liquidity.

Full MLPX profile⁠

Full PXJ profile⁠

MLPX vs PXJ Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MLPX vs PXJ Cost

Overpaying PXJ vs MLPX

$3,318

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • MLPX 0.45%

    $9,041

  • PXJ 0.63%

    $12,359

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • MLPX 0.45%
  • PXJ 0.63%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530PXJ $12,359MLPX $9,041

Year by year

YearMLPXPXJOverpaying
10$812$1,128$316
20$3,128$4,311$1,183
30$9,041$12,359$3,318

Expense ratio

  • 0.45%MLPX, cheaper
  • 0.63%PXJ
  • Middle half of Energy Sector funds
  • Median 0.63%

MLPX 2nd cheapest of 7 funds

PXJ 4th cheapest of 7 funds

MLPX vs PXJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
MLPX 4.01%, better
PXJ 2.63%
Payout (12M)
MLPX $3.07
PXJ $1.23
Last payment
MLPX $0.76
PXJ $0.44
Ex-dividend
MLPX Aug 10, 2026
PXJ Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
MLPX Aug 13, 2026
PXJ Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
MLPX Quarterly
PXJ Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

MLPXQuarterly · 44 paymentsAll MLPX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 44 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Feb 7, 2017 $0.45; May 5, 2017 $0.44; Aug 7, 2017 $0.42; Nov 7, 2017 $0.42; Dec 28, 2017 $0.06; Feb 8, 2018 $0.44; May 10, 2018 $0.47; Aug 9, 2018 $0.49; Nov 8, 2018 $0.49; Dec 28, 2018 $0.07; Feb 7, 2019 $0.51; May 7, 2019 $0.53; Aug 7, 2019 $0.54; Nov 7, 2019 $0.56; Feb 7, 2020 $0.57; May 7, 2020 $0.54; Aug 7, 2020 $0.57; Nov 6, 2020 $0.57; Feb 5, 2021 $0.57; May 7, 2021 $0.52; Aug 6, 2021 $0.50; Nov 5, 2021 $0.50; Dec 30, 2021 $0.02; Feb 7, 2022 $0.50; May 6, 2022 $0.53; Aug 5, 2022 $0.55; Nov 7, 2022 $0.55; Feb 7, 2023 $0.55; May 5, 2023 $0.58; Aug 7, 2023 $0.60; Nov 7, 2023 $0.60; Feb 7, 2024 $0.60; May 7, 2024 $0.65; Aug 7, 2024 $0.65; Nov 7, 2024 $0.65; Dec 30, 2024 $0.05; Feb 7, 2025 $0.69; May 7, 2025 $0.72; Aug 7, 2025 $0.73; Nov 7, 2025 $0.73; Dec 30, 2025 $0.08; Feb 9, 2026 $0.74; May 11, 2026 $0.76; Aug 10, 2026 $0.76. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
PXJQuarterly · 35 paymentsAll PXJ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 35 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 16, 2017 $0.12; Sep 18, 2017 $0.21; Dec 18, 2017 $0.99; Jun 18, 2018 $0.14; Sep 24, 2018 $0.09; Dec 24, 2018 $0.07; Mar 18, 2019 $0.29; Jun 24, 2019 $0.14; Sep 23, 2019 $0.09; Dec 23, 2019 $0.09; Mar 23, 2020 $0.29; Jun 22, 2020 $0.14; Sep 21, 2020 $0.13; Dec 21, 2020 $0.12; Jun 21, 2021 $0.03; Sep 20, 2021 $0.03; Mar 21, 2022 $0.01; Jun 21, 2022 $0.04; Sep 19, 2022 $0.04; Dec 19, 2022 $0.08; Mar 20, 2023 $0.07; Jun 20, 2023 $0.15; Sep 18, 2023 $0.21; Dec 18, 2023 $0.15; Mar 18, 2024 $0.10; Jun 24, 2024 $0.36; Sep 23, 2024 $0.26; Dec 23, 2024 $0.21; Mar 24, 2025 $0.12; Jun 23, 2025 $0.26; Sep 22, 2025 $0.22; Dec 22, 2025 $0.25; Mar 23, 2026 $0.21; Jun 22, 2026 $0.33; Sep 21, 2026 $0.44. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

MLPX vs PXJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • MLPX
  • PXJ
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: PXJ −40.1% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
MLPX 16.4%, betterPXJ 27.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
MLPX 1.32, betterPXJ 0.64
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
MLPX −19.7%, betterPXJ −40.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
MLPX 0.28PXJ 0.65

MLPX and PXJ in the news

Popular comparisons

  • MLPXBvsXESB

    Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PXJCvsXESB

    Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.63% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MLPXBvsTMLPC

    Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF · Tortoise MLP ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PXJCvsTMLPC

    Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF · Tortoise MLP ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.63% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MLPXBvsMDSTC

    Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF · Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.80%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PXJCvsMDSTC

    Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF · Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.63% · 0.80%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.