MLPX ranks 2nd and PXJ 4th of 7 funds in the Energy Sector Category.
MLPX vs PXJ
MLPX −0.18pt a year
0.45%0.63%
MLPX 6.4×the volume
375K58.6K
MLPX +11.0pt
+12.1%+1.1%
MLPX vs PXJ Performance
+158.3%+186.8%
- MLPX 0.45%, better
- PXJ 0.63%
- MLPX $3.8B
- PXJ $139M
- MLPX +36.7%
- PXJ +62.4%, better
- MLPX 4.01%, better
- PXJ 2.63%
- MLPX 30
- PXJ 33
- MLPX 375K sh, better
- PXJ 58.6K sh
- MLPX $76.71
- PXJ $46.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MLPX | PXJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A71Higher | C45 |
| Mission | D32 | |
| Risk | B65Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | B66Higher | B58 |
| Holdings | C44 | A73Higher |
| Durability | A71Higher | B55 |
Rank among Energy Sector funds
Same Category. MLPX and PXJ are both graded against the same 7 Energy Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MLPXB
PXJC
In short
MLPX A focused bet on the toll roads of American energy: roughly 30 pipeline and infrastructure names tracking the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index, running since 2013 at 0.45% a year.
PXJ Oilfield services run through a quant filter: PXJ's index ranks drillers, equipment makers and service firms on momentum, quality and value, then holds about 30. Trading since 2005, at 0.63% net of a waiver through August 31, 2028.
Stated mandate
MLPX The fund seeks to provide investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the price and yield performance of the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index.
PXJ The Fund tracks the Dynamic Oil Services Intellidex Index by normally investing at least 90% of total assets in its constituent common stocks. The index targets 30 U.S. companies supporting oil and gas production, processing, and distribution.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MLPX vs PXJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MLPX vs PXJ Cost
Overpaying PXJ vs MLPX
$3,318
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MLPX 0.45%
$9,041
PXJ 0.63%
$12,359
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MLPX | PXJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $1,128 | $316 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $4,311 | $1,183 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $12,359 | $3,318 |
- 0.45%MLPX, cheaper
- 0.63%PXJ
- Middle half of Energy Sector funds
- Median 0.63%
MLPX 2nd cheapest of 7 funds
PXJ 4th cheapest of 7 funds
MLPX vs PXJ Dividends
- MLPX 4.01%, better
- PXJ 2.63%
- MLPX $3.07
- PXJ $1.23
- MLPX $0.76
- PXJ $0.44
- MLPX Aug 10, 2026
- PXJ Sep 21, 2026
- MLPX Aug 13, 2026
- PXJ Sep 25, 2026
- MLPX Quarterly
- PXJ Quarterly
Distribution history
MLPX vs PXJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- MLPX
- PXJ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MLPX 16.4%, betterPXJ 27.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- MLPX 1.32, betterPXJ 0.64
- Worst fall
- MLPX −19.7%, betterPXJ −40.1%
- Market sensitivity
- MLPX 0.28PXJ 0.65
MLPX and PXJ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
