VCRM ranks 2nd and MMIN 24th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
MMIN vs VCRM
VCRM −0.18pt a year
0.30%0.12%
VCRM 3.1×the volume
222K679K
MMIN vs VCRM Performance
+0.2%+1.2%
- MMIN 0.30%
- VCRM 0.12%, better
- MMIN $572M
- VCRM $2.2B
- MMIN +0.2%
- VCRM +1.2%, better
- MMIN 4.48%, better
- VCRM 4.10%
- MMIN 263
- VCRM 2595
- MMIN 222K sh
- VCRM 679K sh, better
- MMIN $23.10
- VCRM $73.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MMIN | VCRM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C48 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A91 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C44 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | A72 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | B59 | A81Higher |
| Durability | C49 | A74Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. MMIN and VCRM are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MMINB
VCRMA
In short
MMIN MacKay Shields has run this one since 2017 around a niche most muni ETFs ignore: insured municipal bonds, investment-grade paper carrying a bond insurer's policy. Actively managed, pays monthly, 0.30% net of a fee waiver.
VCRM Vanguard's active answer in a mostly-index category: managers working the whole muni curve for 0.12% a year, under half the muni ETF median fee. Monthly income, exempt from federal personal income taxes.
Stated mandate
MMIN The Fund seeks current income that is exempt from federal income tax.
VCRM The fund seeks total return through current income exempt from federal personal income taxes and capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MMIN vs VCRM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MMIN vs VCRM Cost
Overpaying MMIN vs VCRM
$3,629
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MMIN 0.30%
$6,149
VCRM 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MMIN | VCRM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $220 | $325 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $859 | $1,254 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $2,520 | $3,629 |
- 0.30%MMIN
- 0.12%VCRM, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
VCRM 8th cheapest of 63 funds
MMIN 30th cheapest of 63 funds
MMIN vs VCRM Dividends
- MMIN 4.48%, better
- VCRM 4.10%
- MMIN $1.04
- VCRM $3.03
- MMIN $0.08
- VCRM $0.21
- MMIN Oct 30, 2026
- VCRM Nov 2, 2026
- MMIN Pays Nov 3, 2026
- VCRM Pays Nov 4, 2026
- MMIN Monthly
- VCRM Monthly
Distribution history
MMIN vs VCRM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MMIN 7.2%VCRM 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- MMIN 0.14VCRM −0.32
- Worst fall
- MMIN −16.5%VCRM −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- MMIN 1.15VCRM 0.17
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.