PANG ranks 3rd and MRAL 264th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
MRAL vs PANG
PANG −0.69pt a year
1.45%0.76%
MRAL 2.9×the volume
131K44.6K
MRAL vs PANG Performance
−94.4%+91.6%
- MRAL 1.45%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- MRAL $24M
- PANG $9M
- MRAL −94.4%
- PANG +91.6%, better
- MRAL 2
- PANG 4
- MRAL 131K sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- MRAL $13.71
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MRAL | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F19 | A70Higher |
| Mission | B67 | A94Higher |
| Risk | F24 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | B62 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A73Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. MRAL and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MRALD
PANGA
In short
MRAL Two times the daily move of MARA Holdings, a bitcoin miner whose shares already travel in big steps, built from swaps that reset each afternoon. GraniteShares rates it top of its own risk scale and aims it at single-day holds.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
MRAL The fund seeks to deliver twice the daily return of MARA Holdings Corporation for active traders seeking amplified short-term exposure.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MRAL vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MRAL vs PANG Cost
Overpaying MRAL vs PANG
$10,914
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MRAL 1.45%
$25,570
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MRAL | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,509 | $1,353 | $1,156 |
| 20 | $9,241 | $5,142 | $4,099 |
| 30 | $25,570 | $14,656 | $10,914 |
- 1.45%MRAL
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
MRAL 260th cheapest of 315 funds
MRAL vs PANG Dividends
- MRAL None
- PANG
- MRAL
- PANG $1.30
- MRAL
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- MRAL
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- MRAL
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
MRAL vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MRAL 133.6%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- MRAL −0.41PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- MRAL −96.5%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- MRAL 7.70PANG 3.32
MRAL and PANG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.45% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.45% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.45% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
