PEPS ranks 21st and MRSK 50th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.
MRSK vs PEPS
PEPS −0.88pt a year
0.98%0.10%
MRSK 66.8×the volume
27.9K417
MRSK vs PEPS Performance
+8.2%+13.2%
- MRSK 0.98%
- PEPS 0.10%, better
- MRSK $312M
- PEPS $28M
- MRSK +8.2%
- PEPS +13.2%, better
- MRSK 0.36%
- PEPS 0.98%, better
- MRSK 4
- PEPS 192
- MRSK 27.9K sh, better
- PEPS 417 sh
- MRSK $38.11
- PEPS $31.53
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MRSK | PEPS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F8 | A100Higher |
| Mission | F10 | |
| Risk | D39Higher | D25 |
| Tradability | C47Higher | D33 |
| Holdings | D30 | A71Higher |
| Durability | B63Higher | D39 |
Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds
Same Category. MRSK and PEPS are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MRSKF
PEPSB
In short
MRSK Most options-income funds just sell calls on stocks. MRSK runs two engines: S&P 500 exposure plus options on one side, Treasuries and Treasury futures on the other, chasing income and growth while trying to limit the damage.
PEPS Active management at index-fund pricing. PEPS holds a U.S. large-cap base, then writes S&P 500 calls against offsetting long exposure: a beta-neutral overlay built to add return rather than swap upside for income.
Stated mandate
MRSK The Fund seeks income and long-term capital growth while limiting risk. It combines an equity-market strategy using S&P 500 exposure and options with a fixed-income strategy using U.S. Treasury securities and related futures.
PEPS The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is actively managed, using a U.S. large-cap equity base and beta-neutral call overwriting on the S&P 500 with offsetting long exposure to seek incremental total return.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MRSK vs PEPS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MRSK vs PEPS Cost
Overpaying MRSK vs PEPS
$16,256
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MRSK 0.98%
$18,362
PEPS 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MRSK | PEPS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,729 | $183 | $1,546 |
| 20 | $6,504 | $717 | $5,787 |
| 30 | $18,362 | $2,106 | $16,256 |
- 0.98%MRSK
- 0.10%PEPS, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
- Median 0.60%
PEPS cheapest of 51 funds
MRSK 47th cheapest of 51 funds
MRSK vs PEPS Dividends
- MRSK 0.36%
- PEPS 0.98%, better
- MRSK $0.14
- PEPS $0.32
- MRSK $0.04
- PEPS $0.09
- MRSK Dec 30, 2025
- PEPS Sep 21, 2026
- MRSK Jan 5, 2026
- PEPS Sep 25, 2026
- MRSK Irregular
- PEPS Quarterly
Distribution history
MRSK vs PEPS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MRSK 8.6%PEPS 12.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- MRSK 1.10PEPS 0.85
- Worst fall
- MRSK −14.7%PEPS −21.3%
- Market sensitivity
- MRSK 0.66PEPS 1.02
MRSK and PEPS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.98% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.