PANG ranks 3rd and MSFL 44th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
MSFL vs PANG
PANG −0.39pt a year
1.15%0.76%
MSFL 31.1×the volume
1.39M44.6K
MSFL vs PANG Performance
−15.1%+91.6%
- MSFL 1.15%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- MSFL $60M
- PANG $9M
- MSFL −15.1%
- PANG +91.6%, better
- MSFL 2
- PANG 4
- MSFL 1.39M sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- MSFL $27.74
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MSFL | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A80 | A94Higher |
| Risk | B59 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | A96Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A80Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. MSFL and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MSFLB
PANGA
In short
MSFL A one-day trading tool, not a way to own Microsoft: it aims to double MSFT's daily move, then resets every evening. Costs 1.15% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026, above the category norm.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
MSFL The Fund seeks daily results equal to twice the daily percentage change of Microsoft Corporation’s common stock before fees and expenses; it is designed for daily leveraged exposure rather than matching Microsoft’s return over longer periods.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MSFL vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MSFL vs PANG Cost
Overpaying MSFL vs PANG
$6,421
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MSFL 1.15%
$21,077
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MSFL | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,015 | $1,353 | $662 |
| 20 | $7,521 | $5,142 | $2,379 |
| 30 | $21,077 | $14,656 | $6,421 |
- 1.15%MSFL
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
MSFL 222nd cheapest of 315 funds
MSFL vs PANG Dividends
- MSFL None
- PANG
- MSFL
- PANG $1.30
- MSFL
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- MSFL
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- MSFL
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
MSFL vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MSFL 59.5%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- MSFL 0.24PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- MSFL −62.1%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- MSFL 3.15PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 1.15% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.15% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.15% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.