TSMG ranks 1st and MSFL 44th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
MSFL vs TSMG
TSMG −0.39pt a year
1.15%0.76%
MSFL 20.1×the volume
1.39M69K
MSFL vs TSMG Performance
−15.1%+40.8%
- MSFL 1.15%
- TSMG 0.76%, better
- MSFL $60M
- TSMG $28M
- MSFL −15.1%
- TSMG +40.8%, better
- MSFL 2
- TSMG 5
- MSFL 1.39M sh, better
- TSMG 69K sh
- MSFL $27.74
- TSMG $33.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MSFL | TSMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A80Higher | A79 |
| Risk | B59 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | A96Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A80Higher | B67 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. MSFL and TSMG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MSFLB
TSMGA
In short
MSFL A one-day trading tool, not a way to own Microsoft: it aims to double MSFT's daily move, then resets every evening. Costs 1.15% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026, above the category norm.
TSMG Two times TSM, one day at a time. TSMG aims for 200% of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, no margin account required, at 0.75% a year, below what most leveraged single-stock funds charge.
Stated mandate
MSFL The Fund seeks daily results equal to twice the daily percentage change of Microsoft Corporation’s common stock before fees and expenses; it is designed for daily leveraged exposure rather than matching Microsoft’s return over longer periods.
TSMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MSFL vs TSMG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MSFL vs TSMG Cost
Overpaying MSFL vs TSMG
$6,421
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MSFL 1.15%
$21,077
TSMG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MSFL | TSMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,015 | $1,353 | $662 |
| 20 | $7,521 | $5,142 | $2,379 |
| 30 | $21,077 | $14,656 | $6,421 |
- 1.15%MSFL
- 0.76%TSMG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
TSMG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
MSFL 222nd cheapest of 315 funds
MSFL vs TSMG Dividends
- MSFL None
- TSMG
- MSFL
- TSMG $2.73
- MSFL
- TSMG Dec 30, 2025
- MSFL
- TSMG Jan 2, 2026
- MSFL
- TSMG Irregular
Distribution history
MSFL vs TSMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MSFL 59.5%TSMG 77.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- MSFL 0.24TSMG 0.97
- Worst fall
- MSFL −62.1%TSMG −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- MSFL 3.15TSMG 3.81
Popular comparisons
- 1.15% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.15% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.15% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.