TSMG ranks 1st and MSFU 29th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
MSFU vs TSMG
TSMG −0.22pt a year
0.98%0.76%
MSFU 77.5×the volume
5.35M69K
MSFU vs TSMG Performance
−15.3%+40.8%
- MSFU 0.98%
- TSMG 0.76%, better
- MSFU $416M
- TSMG $28M
- MSFU −15.3%
- TSMG +40.8%, better
- MSFU 7.81%
- TSMG
- MSFU 7
- TSMG 5
- MSFU 5.35M sh, better
- TSMG 69K sh
- MSFU $41.59
- TSMG $33.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MSFU | TSMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C54 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A81Higher | A79 |
| Risk | B61 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | A70 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A87Higher | B67 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. MSFU and TSMG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MSFUB
TSMGA
In short
MSFU A day-trading dial on Microsoft: MSFU targets 200% of MSFT's daily move, then resets every night. It launched as a 1.5x fund and was re-geared to a full 2x in April 2024, so today's version is the more aggressive one.
TSMG Two times TSM, one day at a time. TSMG aims for 200% of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, no margin account required, at 0.75% a year, below what most leveraged single-stock funds charge.
Stated mandate
MSFU The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of Microsoft Corporation common shares.
TSMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MSFU vs TSMG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MSFU vs TSMG Cost
Overpaying MSFU vs TSMG
$3,706
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MSFU 0.98%
$18,362
TSMG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MSFU | TSMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,729 | $1,353 | $376 |
| 20 | $6,504 | $5,142 | $1,362 |
| 30 | $18,362 | $14,656 | $3,706 |
- 0.98%MSFU
- 0.76%TSMG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
TSMG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
MSFU 168th cheapest of 315 funds
MSFU vs TSMG Dividends
- MSFU 7.81%
- TSMG
- MSFU $3.14
- TSMG
- MSFU $0.30
- TSMG $2.73
- MSFU Sep 22, 2026
- TSMG Dec 30, 2025
- MSFU Sep 29, 2026
- TSMG Jan 2, 2026
- MSFU Quarterly
- TSMG Irregular
Distribution history
MSFU vs TSMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MSFU 56.3%TSMG 77.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- MSFU 0.38TSMG 0.97
- Worst fall
- MSFU −62.3%TSMG −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- MSFU 1.84TSMG 3.81
Popular comparisons
- 0.98% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.