MUB ranks 2nd and PZA 17th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
MUB vs PZA
MUB −0.23pt a year
0.05%0.28%
MUB 3.5×the volume
9.29M2.63M
MUB +0.3pt
+1.8%+1.5%
MUB vs PZA Performance
+3.2%−3.4%
- MUB 0.05%, better
- PZA 0.28%
- MUB $54.4B
- PZA $4.11B
- MUB +0.1%, better
- PZA −1.8%
- MUB 3.56%
- PZA 4.01%, better
- MUB 7950
- PZA 7357
- MUB 9.29M sh, better
- PZA 2.63M sh
- MUB $103.96
- PZA $22.15
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MUB | PZA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | B60 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A94 |
| Risk | B60Higher | D30 |
| Tradability | B69 | A72Higher |
| Holdings | A82 | A85Higher |
| Durability | A93Higher | A87 |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. MUB and PZA are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MUBA
PZAB
In short
MUB Municipal bonds, indexed and cheap. Since 2007, MUB has packaged investment-grade national munis into tax-exempt monthly income for five basis points a year, and it sits among the deepest pools in the muni-ETF aisle.
PZA Most muni ETFs hand you the whole yield curve. PZA goes long on purpose: its index only takes bonds with at least 15 years left to maturity, all screened to stay out of the alternative minimum tax. Income lands monthly.
Stated mandate
MUB The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds, providing diversified exposure to the national municipal-bond market and tax-exempt income.
PZA The fund seeks to track an index of tax-exempt municipal debt that is not subject to the alternative minimum tax.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MUB vs PZA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MUB vs PZA Cost
Overpaying PZA vs MUB
$4,695
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MUB 0.05%
$1,060
PZA 0.28%
$5,755
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MUB | PZA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $509 | $417 |
| 20 | $360 | $1,976 | $1,616 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $5,755 | $4,695 |
- 0.05%MUB, cheaper
- 0.28%PZA
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
MUB 3rd cheapest of 63 funds
PZA 24th cheapest of 63 funds
MUB vs PZA Dividends
- MUB 3.56%
- PZA 4.01%, better
- MUB $3.70
- PZA $0.88
- MUB $0.28
- PZA $0.08
- MUB Nov 2, 2026
- PZA Oct 19, 2026
- MUB Pays Nov 5, 2026
- PZA Oct 23, 2026
- MUB Monthly
- PZA Monthly
Distribution history
MUB vs PZA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- MUB
- PZA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MUB 5.7%, betterPZA 7.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- MUB −0.03PZA −0.03Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- MUB −11.6%, betterPZA −18.3%
- Market sensitivity
- MUB 0.90PZA 1.29
MUB and PZA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





