TSDD ranks 2nd and MUZ 23rd of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
MUZ vs TSDD
TSDD −0.33pt a year
1.31%0.98%
MUZ 1.01×the volume
11.2M11M
MUZ vs TSDD Performance
−27.2%−47.1%
- MUZ 1.31%
- TSDD 0.98%, better
- MUZ $9M
- TSDD $30M
- MUZ
- TSDD −26.1%
- MUZ
- TSDD 10.76%
- MUZ 2
- TSDD 1
- MUZ 11.2M sh, better
- TSDD 11M sh
- MUZ $8.92
- TSDD $6.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MUZ | TSDD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C49 | A94Higher |
| Mission | A98 | |
| Risk | D38 | C49Higher |
| Tradability | B66 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C42 | A72Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. MUZ and TSDD are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MUZC
TSDDA
In short
MUZ The first ETF to put -2X daily on Micron, doubling the depth of the -1X bear option that came before it. A trader's tool for memory-chip swings: no margin account, no borrowed shares, just a ticker.
TSDD Tesla bears pick their dosage; this is the double. TSDD aims for -2x TSLA's move each day, reset daily, at 0.95% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026. Designed as a short-term tool, not a buy-and-forget holding.
Stated mandate
MUZ The Fund seeks daily inverse investment results equal to negative two times the daily percentage change in Micron Technology, Inc.'s common stock.
TSDD The fund seeks daily results before fees and expenses equal to negative 200% of the daily percentage change in Tesla's common stock. It is designed as a short-term inverse leveraged vehicle.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MUZ vs TSDD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MUZ vs TSDD Cost
Overpaying MUZ vs TSDD
$5,157
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MUZ 1.31%
$23,519
TSDD 0.98%
$18,362
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MUZ | TSDD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,280 | $1,729 | $551 |
| 20 | $8,450 | $6,504 | $1,946 |
| 30 | $23,519 | $18,362 | $5,157 |
- 1.31%MUZ
- 0.98%TSDD, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSDD 5th cheapest of 43 funds
MUZ 27th cheapest of 43 funds
MUZ vs TSDD Dividends
- MUZ
- TSDD 10.76%
- MUZ None
- TSDD $0.65
- MUZ
- TSDD $0.65
- MUZ
- TSDD Dec 29, 2025
- MUZ
- TSDD Dec 31, 2025
- MUZ
- TSDD Irregular
Distribution history
MUZ vs TSDD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MUZ TSDD 100.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- MUZ TSDD −0.87
- Worst fall
- MUZ TSDD −99.1%
- Market sensitivity
- MUZ 0.00TSDD −2.40
Popular comparisons
- 1.31% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.