AMZD ranks 4th and MUZ 23rd of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AMZD vs MUZ
AMZD −0.29pt a year
1.02%1.31%
AMZD 1.1×the volume
12.2M11.2M
AMZD vs MUZ Performance
+9.7%−27.2%
- AMZD 1.02%, better
- MUZ 1.31%
- AMZD $18M
- MUZ $9M
- AMZD −5.6%
- MUZ
- AMZD 2.71%
- MUZ
- AMZD 3
- MUZ 2
- AMZD 12.2M sh, better
- MUZ 11.2M sh
- AMZD $9.03
- MUZ $8.92
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AMZD | MUZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78Higher | C49 |
| Mission | A96 | |
| Risk | A72Higher | D38 |
| Tradability | A74Higher | B66 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A70Higher | C42 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AMZD and MUZ are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AMZDA
MUZC
In short
AMZD Most single-stock bear funds reach for leverage. AMZD skips it: one dollar down for every dollar Amazon rises, for a single trading day, through swaps you buy like any share. 1.02% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
MUZ The first ETF to put -2X daily on Micron, doubling the depth of the -1X bear option that came before it. A trader's tool for memory-chip swings: no margin account, no borrowed shares, just a ticker.
Stated mandate
AMZD The fund seeks daily inverse investment results tied to AMZN and is materially different from ordinary exchange-traded funds.
MUZ The Fund seeks daily inverse investment results equal to negative two times the daily percentage change in Micron Technology, Inc.'s common stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AMZD vs MUZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AMZD vs MUZ Cost
Overpaying MUZ vs AMZD
$4,507
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AMZD 1.02%
$19,012
MUZ 1.31%
$23,519
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AMZD | MUZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,797 | $2,280 | $483 |
| 20 | $6,746 | $8,450 | $1,704 |
| 30 | $19,012 | $23,519 | $4,507 |
- 1.02%AMZD, cheaper
- 1.31%MUZ
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AMZD 12th cheapest of 43 funds
MUZ 27th cheapest of 43 funds
AMZD vs MUZ Dividends
- AMZD 2.71%
- MUZ
- AMZD $0.24
- MUZ None
- AMZD $0.05
- MUZ
- AMZD Sep 22, 2026
- MUZ
- AMZD Sep 29, 2026
- MUZ
- AMZD Quarterly
- MUZ
Distribution history
AMZD vs MUZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AMZD 27.4%MUZ
- Return per unit of risk
- AMZD −0.86MUZ
- Worst fall
- AMZD −74.7%MUZ
- Market sensitivity
- AMZD −1.26MUZ 0.00
Popular comparisons
- 1.02% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.