QQQD ranks 21st and MYY 32nd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
MYY vs QQQD
QQQD −0.45pt a year
0.95%0.50%
QQQD 8.3×the volume
8.25K68.1K
MYY vs QQQD Performance
−9.0%−0.7%
- MYY 0.95%
- QQQD 0.50%, better
- MYY $4M
- QQQD $28M
- MYY −9.0%
- QQQD −0.7%, better
- MYY 3.46%, better
- QQQD 3.35%
- MYY 1
- QQQD 3
- MYY 8.25K sh
- QQQD 68.1K sh, better
- MYY $15.83
- QQQD $12.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MYY | QQQD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B68Higher | B67 |
| Tradability | D32 | C43Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C49Higher | D38 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. MYY and QQQD are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MYYC
QQQDC
In short
MYY The only -1x ETF built on the S&P MidCap 400, trading since 2006. One ticker, one dose of inverse exposure to America's mid caps, and a target that resets at every close.
QQQD Fading the Magnificent 7 without a leverage multiplier: QQQD aims for -100% of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index's daily move, one-for-one, at 0.50% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
MYY MYY seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse (-1x) of the daily performance of the S&P MidCap 400.
QQQD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MYY vs QQQD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MYY vs QQQD Cost
Overpaying MYY vs QQQD
$7,890
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MYY 0.95%
$17,869
QQQD 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MYY | QQQD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $900 | $778 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $3,460 | $2,862 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $9,979 | $7,890 |
- 0.95%MYY
- 0.50%QQQD, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QQQD cheapest of 53 funds
MYY 6th cheapest of 53 funds
MYY vs QQQD Dividends
- MYY 3.46%, better
- QQQD 3.35%
- MYY $0.55
- QQQD $0.41
- MYY $0.12
- QQQD $0.10
- MYY Sep 23, 2026
- QQQD Sep 22, 2026
- MYY Sep 29, 2026
- QQQD Sep 29, 2026
- MYY Quarterly
- QQQD Quarterly
Distribution history
MYY vs QQQD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MYY 14.8%QQQD 21.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- MYY −1.01QQQD −1.14
- Worst fall
- MYY −38.7%QQQD −51.4%
- Market sensitivity
- MYY −0.99QQQD −1.35
MYY and QQQD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
