RWM ranks 4th and MZZ 32nd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
MZZ vs RWM
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
RWM 3815.8×the volume
7.87K30M
RWM +13.3pt
−24.4%−11.1%
MZZ vs RWM Performance
−52.9%−18.3%
- MZZ 0.95%
- RWM 0.95%
- MZZ $5M
- RWM $163M
- MZZ −20.3%
- RWM −10.2%, better
- MZZ 3.65%, better
- RWM 3.32%
- MZZ 1
- RWM 3
- MZZ 7.87K sh
- RWM 30M sh, better
- MZZ $6.43
- RWM $14.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MZZ | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C46 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | F18 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | B63 | |
| Durability | C49 | B69Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. MZZ and RWM are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MZZC
RWMB
In short
MZZ A 2006-vintage bear trade on mid-cap America: MZZ aims to deliver two times the inverse of the S&P MidCap 400's daily move, one trading day at a time, while most inverse funds point at the big large-cap indexes.
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
MZZ The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the inverse of the S&P MidCap 400's daily performance.
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MZZ vs RWM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MZZ vs RWM Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MZZ 0.95%
$17,869
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MZZ | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%MZZ
- 0.95%RWM
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
MZZ 6th cheapest of 53 funds
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
MZZ vs RWM Dividends
- MZZ 3.65%, better
- RWM 3.32%
- MZZ $0.23
- RWM $0.48
- MZZ $0.03
- RWM $0.09
- MZZ Sep 23, 2026
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- MZZ Sep 29, 2026
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- MZZ Quarterly
- RWM Quarterly
Distribution history
MZZ vs RWM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- MZZ
- RWM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MZZ 29.4%RWM 18.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- MZZ −0.99RWM −0.99Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- MZZ −71.2%RWM −43.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- MZZ −1.98RWM −1.23
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.