Skip to content

NAPR vs NJAN

Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April

NAPRCCboe

Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

NJANCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

NAPR0.79%NJAN0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

NJAN 2.6×the volume

NAPR5.42KNJAN14.3K

5Y return · a year

NAPR +2.1pt

NAPR+9.4%NJAN+7.3%

NAPR vs NJAN Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+56.9%NAPR+42.3%NJAN

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. NAPR +56.9%. NJAN +42.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
NAPR 0.79%
NJAN 0.79%
Fund size
NAPR $205M
NJAN $333M
1Y total return
NAPR +13.5%, better
NJAN +11.0%
Holdings
NAPR 3
NJAN 3
Avg volume (30D)
NAPR 5.42K sh
NJAN 14.3K sh, better
NAV per share
NAPR $60.28
NJAN $59.79
52W range

ETF.net Grade

NAPR: Cost 39, Risk 64, Mission not scored, Tradability 58, Holdings not scored, Durability 79. NJAN: Cost 39, Risk 49, Mission not scored, Tradability 79, Holdings not scored, Durability 87.
Pillar letters and Scores for NAPR, NJAN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarNAPRNJAN
Cost30% weightD39D39
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB64HigherC49
Tradability15% weightB58A79Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA79A87Higher

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. NAPR and NJAN are both graded against the same 15 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 15 funds
See all 15 ›

NJAN ranks 2nd and NAPR 4th of 15 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BQBQFAllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETFScore 58
  2. Rank 2CNJANInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETFScore 54
  3. Rank 3CNOCTInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETFScore 53
  4. Rank 4CNAPRInnovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - AprilScore 52
  5. Rank 4CNJULInnovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - JulyScore 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

NAPRCInnovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April

NJANCInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

In short

NAPR A one-year seatbelt on the Nasdaq-100. NAPR aims to absorb the first 15% of losses in the Nasdaq-100 ETF it references over each April-to-March stretch, in exchange for a ceiling on gains that is reset every April.

NJAN The January rung of Innovator's Nasdaq-100 ladder: hold a QQQ-linked stake, hand back the upside above a cap set each January, and get the first 15% of the year's losses absorbed. Big tech with the top and bottom sanded down.

Stated mandate

NAPR The Fund seeks to track the return of the Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ), subject to a predetermined upside cap and protection against the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.

NJAN The fund seeks capped upside exposure to the Invesco QQQ Trust while protecting against the first 15% of losses during each approximately annual outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • NAPR Deep cushion by design: the structure targets the first 15 percentage points of reference-ETF losses over the outcome period, so you take the hit only past that line.innovatoretfs.com
  • It rolls instead of expiring. Every April 1 the buffer resets and a fresh cap is struck for the next twelve months, so the position keeps running without you rebuilding it.innovatoretfs.com
  • Running since 2020, this April vintage has several completed outcome periods behind it, back when defined-outcome funds were still a curiosity rather than a shelf.
  • The 0.79% fee sits right at the median for Nasdaq-100 buffer funds, and the overall build lands in the upper half of that peer group.
  • NJAN Deep cushion by design: the first 15% of the reference asset's losses over each roughly one-year outcome period are absorbed before you feel anything.
  • The reference asset is the Invesco QQQ Trust itself, not a bespoke index. What you're buffering is the same Nasdaq-100 exposure most investors already know.
  • Part of a dated series (NAPR, NJUL run the same 15% Power Buffer on different start months), so entry dates can be laddered rather than bet on one January.
  • Fee sits right at the middle of the Nasdaq-100 buffer aisle at 0.79%, and the fund has been running its annual reset since 2020.

Worth knowing

  • NAPR The cushion is paid for with a ceiling. Upside is capped at a level struck each April, so a blistering Nasdaq year above that cap is return you watch rather than collect.innovatoretfs.com
  • Terms are built for the full April-to-March period. Buy mid-period and your personal cushion and ceiling differ from the headline numbers, sometimes a lot.innovatoretfs.com
  • Mid-pack on cost, not cheap: PBQQ runs 0.50% and the Calamos Nasdaq-100 series 0.69%. Shares also trade thinly, which can widen the spread at the point of entry.
  • NJAN The cap is the price of the buffer. It's reset each January from options pricing, so a scorching Nasdaq-100 year gets left partly on the table.
  • Outcomes are engineered start-to-finish of the period. Buy or sell mid-period and your real cushion and remaining upside differ from the headline terms.
  • Cheaper ways to buffer the Nasdaq-100 exist (PBQQ runs 0.50%), and this one trades lightly, so limit orders matter more here than with the category's giants.

Full NAPR profile⁠

Full NJAN profile⁠

NAPR vs NJAN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

NAPR vs NJAN Cost

Same expense ratio

$15,174

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • NAPR 0.79%

    $15,174

  • NJAN 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • NAPR 0.79%
  • NJAN 0.79%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530NAPR $15,174NJAN $15,174

Year by year

YearNAPRNJAN
10$1,405$1,405
20$5,331$5,331
30$15,174$15,174

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%NAPR
  • 0.79%NJAN
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

NAPR 8th cheapest of 15 funds

NJAN 8th cheapest of 15 funds

NAPR vs NJAN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
NAPR None
NJAN None

Distribution history

NAPRAll NAPR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

NJANAll NJAN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

NAPR vs NJAN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • NAPR
  • NJAN
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: NJAN −20.7% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
NAPR 7.2%NJAN 7.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
NAPR 1.13NJAN 1.20, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
NAPR −16.5%, betterNJAN −20.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
NAPR 0.48NJAN 0.44

NAPR and NJAN in the news

Popular comparisons

  • NAPRCvsQBQFB

    Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April · AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NJANCvsQBQFB

    Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF · AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NAPRCvsNOCTC

    Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NJANCvsNOCTC

    Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NAPRCvsNJULC

    Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April · Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NJANCvsNJULC

    Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF · Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.