Skip to content
etf.net

NAPR vs QBQF

Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April

NAPRCCboe

AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF

QBQFBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

QBQF −0.05pt a year

NAPR0.79%QBQF0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

NAPR 1.4×the volume

NAPR5.42KQBQF3.94K

NAPR vs QBQF Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+2.1%NAPR−0.1%QBQF

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. NAPR +2.1%. QBQF −0.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.1%3%4%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
NAPR 0.79%
QBQF 0.74%, better
Fund size
NAPR $205M
QBQF $12M
1Y total return
NAPR +13.5%
QBQF No data
Holdings
NAPR 3
QBQF 3
Avg volume (30D)
NAPR 5.42K sh, better
QBQF 3.94K sh
NAV per share
NAPR $60.28
QBQF $25.88
52W range

ETF.net Grade

NAPR: Cost 39, Risk 64, Mission not scored, Tradability 58, Holdings not scored, Durability 79. QBQF: Cost 68, Risk 73, Mission not scored, Tradability 35, Holdings 99, Durability 32.
Pillar letters and Scores for NAPR, QBQF, with each pillar’s weight
PillarNAPRQBQF
Cost30% weightD39B68Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB64A73Higher
Tradability15% weightB58HigherD35
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA99
Durability5% weightA79HigherD32

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. NAPR and QBQF are both graded against the same 15 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 15 funds
See all 15 ›

QBQF ranks 1st and NAPR 4th of 15 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BQBQFAllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETFScore 58
  2. Rank 2CNJANInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETFScore 54
  3. Rank 3CNOCTInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETFScore 53
  4. Rank 4CNAPRInnovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - AprilScore 52
  5. Rank 4CNJULInnovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - JulyScore 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

NAPRCInnovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April

QBQFBAllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF

In short

NAPR A one-year seatbelt on the Nasdaq-100. NAPR aims to absorb the first 15% of losses in the Nasdaq-100 ETF it references over each April-to-March stretch, in exchange for a ceiling on gains that is reset every April.

QBQF No data

Stated mandate

NAPR The Fund seeks to track the return of the Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ), subject to a predetermined upside cap and protection against the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.

QBQF No data

Why people hold it

  • NAPR Deep cushion by design: the structure targets the first 15 percentage points of reference-ETF losses over the outcome period, so you take the hit only past that line.innovatoretfs.com
  • It rolls instead of expiring. Every April 1 the buffer resets and a fresh cap is struck for the next twelve months, so the position keeps running without you rebuilding it.innovatoretfs.com
  • Running since 2020, this April vintage has several completed outcome periods behind it, back when defined-outcome funds were still a curiosity rather than a shelf.
  • The 0.79% fee sits right at the median for Nasdaq-100 buffer funds, and the overall build lands in the upper half of that peer group.

QBQF No data

Worth knowing

  • NAPR The cushion is paid for with a ceiling. Upside is capped at a level struck each April, so a blistering Nasdaq year above that cap is return you watch rather than collect.innovatoretfs.com
  • Terms are built for the full April-to-March period. Buy mid-period and your personal cushion and ceiling differ from the headline numbers, sometimes a lot.innovatoretfs.com
  • Mid-pack on cost, not cheap: PBQQ runs 0.50% and the Calamos Nasdaq-100 series 0.69%. Shares also trade thinly, which can widen the spread at the point of entry.

QBQF No data

Full NAPR profile⁠

Full QBQF profile⁠

NAPR vs QBQF Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

NAPR vs QBQF Cost

Overpaying NAPR vs QBQF

$867

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • NAPR 0.79%

    $15,174

  • QBQF 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • NAPR 0.79%
  • QBQF 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530NAPR $15,174QBQF $14,307

Year by year

YearNAPRQBQFOverpaying
10$1,405$1,319$86
20$5,331$5,015$316
30$15,174$14,307$867

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%NAPR
  • 0.74%QBQF, cheaper
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

QBQF 7th cheapest of 15 funds

NAPR 8th cheapest of 15 funds

NAPR vs QBQF Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
NAPR None
QBQF None

Distribution history

NAPRAll NAPR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QBQFAll QBQF payments⁠

No distribution history available.

NAPR vs QBQF Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
NAPR 7.2%QBQF No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
NAPR 1.13QBQF No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
NAPR −16.5%QBQF No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
NAPR 0.48QBQF 0.19

Popular comparisons

  • NAPRCvsNJANC

    Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QBQFBvsNJANC

    AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NAPRCvsNOCTC

    Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QBQFBvsNOCTC

    AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NAPRCvsNJULC

    Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April · Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QBQFBvsNJULC

    AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF · Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.