SCYB ranks 2nd and NHYB 8th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
NHYB vs SCYB
SCYB −0.05pt a year
0.08%0.03%
SCYB 11.4×the volume
97.2K1.1M
NHYB vs SCYB Performance
+2.2%+2.0%
- NHYB 0.08%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- NHYB $1.8B
- SCYB $2.8B
- NHYB +2.2%, better
- SCYB +2.0%
- NHYB
- SCYB 7.82%
- NHYB 1692
- SCYB 1844
- NHYB 97.2K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- NHYB $23.92
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NHYB | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A98 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C47 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | C44 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | A93 | A99Higher |
| Durability | C49 | B68Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. NHYB and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NHYBA
SCYBA
In short
NHYB ESG-screened high yield priced like the plain stuff: 0.08% a year, well over a thousand bonds, and the same Bloomberg MSCI index Nuveen's older, pricier ETF follows.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
NHYB The fund seeks to track the Bloomberg MSCI U.S. High Yield Very Liquid ESG Select Index before fees and expenses. Its strategy uses representative sampling and normally invests at least 80% of assets in index components.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NHYB vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NHYB vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying NHYB vs SCYB
$1,051
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NHYB 0.08%
$1,689
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NHYB | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $55 | $92 |
| 20 | $575 | $216 | $359 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $638 | $1,051 |
- 0.08%NHYB
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
NHYB 6th cheapest of 84 funds
NHYB vs SCYB Dividends
- NHYB
- SCYB 7.82%
- NHYB
- SCYB $1.96
- NHYB $0.15
- SCYB $0.16
- NHYB Nov 2, 2026
- SCYB Nov 2, 2026
- NHYB Pays Nov 3, 2026
- SCYB Pays Nov 6, 2026
- NHYB Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
NHYB vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NHYB 4.0%SCYB 4.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- NHYB −0.38SCYB 0.82
- Worst fall
- NHYB −3.1%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- NHYB 0.15SCYB 0.28
NHYB and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
