Skip to content
etf.net

NJUL vs QBQF

Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July

NJULCCboe

AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF

QBQFBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

QBQF −0.05pt a year

NJUL0.79%QBQF0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

NJUL 5.4×the volume

NJUL21.4KQBQF3.94K

NJUL vs QBQF Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+0.9%NJUL−0.1%QBQF

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. NJUL +0.9%. QBQF −0.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.2%3%4%5%6%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
NJUL 0.79%
QBQF 0.74%, better
Fund size
NJUL $269M
QBQF $12M
1Y total return
NJUL +4.9%
QBQF No data
Holdings
NJUL 3
QBQF 3
Avg volume (30D)
NJUL 21.4K sh, better
QBQF 3.94K sh
NAV per share
NJUL $75.68
QBQF $25.88
52W range

ETF.net Grade

NJUL: Cost 39, Risk 42, Mission not scored, Tradability 78, Holdings not scored, Durability 87. QBQF: Cost 68, Risk 73, Mission not scored, Tradability 35, Holdings 99, Durability 32.
Pillar letters and Scores for NJUL, QBQF, with each pillar’s weight
PillarNJULQBQF
Cost30% weightD39B68Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC42A73Higher
Tradability15% weightA78HigherD35
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA99
Durability5% weightA87HigherD32

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. NJUL and QBQF are both graded against the same 15 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 15 funds
See all 15 ›

QBQF ranks 1st and NJUL 4th of 15 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BQBQFAllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETFScore 58
  2. Rank 2CNJANInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETFScore 54
  3. Rank 4CNAPRInnovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - AprilScore 52
  4. Rank 4CNJULInnovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - JulyScore 52
  5. Rank 6CNJUNInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - JuneScore 46

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

NJULCInnovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July

QBQFBAllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF

In short

NJUL Nasdaq-100 exposure with a seatbelt. NJUL absorbs the first 15% of QQQ's losses over a one-year outcome period that resets each July, and in exchange accepts a ceiling on the upside set the day the period begins.

QBQF No data

Stated mandate

NJUL The fund seeks to track the return of the Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ), subject to a predetermined cap, while protecting investors from the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.

QBQF No data

Why people hold it

  • NJUL The contract is written down, not implied: a 15-point cushion against QQQ's decline over the outcome period, with the trade-off stated in the prospectus.
  • The clock resets every July 1. Investors who start with a fresh period know the buffer and the cap before they commit, rather than guessing at the risk.
  • A plain 1940 Act ETF, not a bank-issued structured note, so the defined outcome doesn't ride on a single issuer's credit.
  • Live since 2020, with siblings NJAN and NAPR running the same Nasdaq-100 buffer recipe at the same 0.79% on different reset dates.

QBQF No data

Worth knowing

  • NJUL The ceiling is real. The cap is fixed when each period starts, so a runaway Nasdaq year leaves gains on the table.
  • Buy mid-period and you inherit whatever buffer and cap are left, not the headline 15%. Full terms belong to holders who own from the reset date.
  • At 0.79% it matches the typical Nasdaq-100 buffer fund, but sits above PBQQ at 0.50% and the Calamos series at 0.69%, and it isn't among the group's busiest tickers.

QBQF No data

Full NJUL profile⁠

Full QBQF profile⁠

NJUL vs QBQF Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

NJUL vs QBQF Cost

Overpaying NJUL vs QBQF

$867

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • NJUL 0.79%

    $15,174

  • QBQF 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • NJUL 0.79%
  • QBQF 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530NJUL $15,174QBQF $14,307

Year by year

YearNJULQBQFOverpaying
10$1,405$1,319$86
20$5,331$5,015$316
30$15,174$14,307$867

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%NJUL
  • 0.74%QBQF, cheaper
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

QBQF 7th cheapest of 15 funds

NJUL 8th cheapest of 15 funds

NJUL vs QBQF Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
NJUL None
QBQF None

Distribution history

NJULAll NJUL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QBQFAll QBQF payments⁠

No distribution history available.

NJUL vs QBQF Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
NJUL 8.8%QBQF No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
NJUL 1.09QBQF No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
NJUL −14.4%QBQF No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
NJUL 0.58QBQF 0.19

Popular comparisons

  • NJULCvsNJANC

    Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QBQFBvsNJANC

    AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NJULCvsNOCTC

    Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QBQFBvsNOCTC

    AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NJULCvsNAPRC

    Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July · Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QBQFBvsNAPRC

    AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF · Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.