Skip to content

NJUL vs NOCT

Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July

NJULCCboe

Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

NOCTCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

NJUL0.79%NOCT0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

NOCT 1.6×the volume

NJUL21.4KNOCT35.1K

5Y return · a year

NJUL +0.5pt

NJUL+9.7%NOCT+9.2%

NJUL vs NOCT Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+58.6%NJUL+55.5%NOCT

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. NJUL +58.6%. NOCT +55.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
NJUL 0.79%
NOCT 0.79%
Fund size
NJUL $269M
NOCT $315M
1Y total return
NJUL +4.9%
NOCT +8.0%, better
Yield (12M)
NJUL No data
NOCT 0.00%
Holdings
NJUL 3
NOCT 3
Avg volume (30D)
NJUL 21.4K sh
NOCT 35.1K sh, better
NAV per share
NJUL $75.68
NOCT $62.35
52W range

ETF.net Grade

NJUL: Cost 39, Risk 42, Mission not scored, Tradability 78, Holdings not scored, Durability 87. NOCT: Cost 39, Risk 48, Mission 93, Tradability 77, Holdings not scored, Durability 91.
Pillar letters and Scores for NJUL, NOCT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarNJULNOCT
Cost30% weightD39D39
Mission25% weightNot scoredA93
Risk15% weightC42C48Higher
Tradability15% weightA78HigherA77
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA87A91Higher

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. NJUL and NOCT are both graded against the same 15 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 15 funds
See all 15 ›

NOCT ranks 3rd and NJUL 4th of 15 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BQBQFAllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETFScore 58
  2. Rank 2CNJANInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETFScore 54
  3. Rank 3CNOCTInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETFScore 53
  4. Rank 4CNAPRInnovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - AprilScore 52
  5. Rank 4CNJULInnovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - JulyScore 52
  6. Rank 6CNJUNInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - JuneScore 46

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

NJULCInnovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July

NOCTCInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

In short

NJUL Nasdaq-100 exposure with a seatbelt. NJUL absorbs the first 15% of QQQ's losses over a one-year outcome period that resets each July, and in exchange accepts a ceiling on the upside set the day the period begins.

NOCT Nasdaq-100 exposure with a 15% airbag: over each one-year outcome period starting October 1, the fund absorbs the first 15% of the reference ETF's decline and gives up gains above a cap in return.

Stated mandate

NJUL The fund seeks to track the return of the Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ), subject to a predetermined cap, while protecting investors from the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.

NOCT The Fund uses a defined-outcome strategy based on the Nasdaq-100 exposure of QQQ. It seeks to replicate the underlying ETF’s performance over the outcome period, subject to a capped upside and a 15% downside buffer.

Why people hold it

  • NJUL The contract is written down, not implied: a 15-point cushion against QQQ's decline over the outcome period, with the trade-off stated in the prospectus.
  • The clock resets every July 1. Investors who start with a fresh period know the buffer and the cap before they commit, rather than guessing at the risk.
  • A plain 1940 Act ETF, not a bank-issued structured note, so the defined outcome doesn't ride on a single issuer's credit.
  • Live since 2020, with siblings NJAN and NAPR running the same Nasdaq-100 buffer recipe at the same 0.79% on different reset dates.
  • NOCT The deal is written into the prospectus: a 15% buffer against the reference Nasdaq-100 ETF's losses over each outcome period, paid for with a capped upside, reset every October 1.innovatoretfs.com
  • Live since October 2019, so the reset-and-cap machinery has years of real market cycles behind it rather than a backtest.
  • At 0.79%, the fee sits at the median for Nasdaq-100 buffer funds. The defined-outcome plumbing costs no premium versus the cohort.
  • An October start date makes this the autumn rung for anyone spreading buffer exposure across reset months instead of concentrating on one date.

Worth knowing

  • NJUL The ceiling is real. The cap is fixed when each period starts, so a runaway Nasdaq year leaves gains on the table.
  • Buy mid-period and you inherit whatever buffer and cap are left, not the headline 15%. Full terms belong to holders who own from the reset date.
  • At 0.79% it matches the typical Nasdaq-100 buffer fund, but sits above PBQQ at 0.50% and the Calamos series at 0.69%, and it isn't among the group's busiest tickers.
  • NOCT Thinly traded, so spreads and limit orders matter more here than with the big plain-index funds.
  • 0.79% is not the cohort floor: PBQQ runs 0.50% and the Calamos Nasdaq-100 protection funds 0.69%, on different protection terms.
  • Buffer and cap are measured across the full outcome period. Enter mid-period and your effective buffer and remaining upside differ from the stated terms.innovatoretfs.com

Full NJUL profile⁠

Full NOCT profile⁠

NJUL vs NOCT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

NJUL vs NOCT Cost

Same expense ratio

$15,174

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • NJUL 0.79%

    $15,174

  • NOCT 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • NJUL 0.79%
  • NOCT 0.79%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530NJUL $15,174NOCT $15,174

Year by year

YearNJULNOCT
10$1,405$1,405
20$5,331$5,331
30$15,174$15,174

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%NJUL
  • 0.79%NOCT
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

NJUL 8th cheapest of 15 funds

NOCT 8th cheapest of 15 funds

NJUL vs NOCT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
NJUL No data
NOCT 0.00%
Payout (12M)
NJUL None
NOCT None

Distribution history

Per share, 2019, same scale for both

NJULAll NJUL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

NOCT1 paymentAll NOCT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2019. Nov 19, 2019 $0.35. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252019

NJUL vs NOCT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • NJUL
  • NOCT
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: NOCT −16.2% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
NJUL 8.8%NOCT 7.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
NJUL 1.09NOCT 1.15, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
NJUL −14.4%, betterNOCT −16.2%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
NJUL 0.58NOCT 0.56

Popular comparisons

  • NJULCvsQBQFB

    Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July · AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NOCTCvsQBQFB

    Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF · AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NJULCvsNJANC

    Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NOCTCvsNJANC

    Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NJULCvsNAPRC

    Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July · Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NOCTCvsNAPRC

    Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF · Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.