VCRM ranks 4th and NMB 60th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
NMB vs VCRM
VCRM −0.41pt a year
0.53%0.12%
VCRM 137.3×the volume
4.94K679K
NMB vs VCRM Performance
−2.5%+1.1%
- NMB 0.53%
- VCRM 0.12%, better
- NMB $47M
- VCRM $2.2B
- NMB −2.5%
- VCRM +1.1%, better
- NMB 5.40%, better
- VCRM 3.81%
- NMB 40
- VCRM 2588
- NMB 4.94K sh
- VCRM 679K sh, better
- NMB $23.86
- VCRM $73.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NMB | VCRM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F10 | A89Higher |
| Mission | B65 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C41 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | D29 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | D28 | A81Higher |
| Durability | F21 | A74Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. NMB and VCRM are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NMBD
VCRMA
In short
NMB Most national muni ETFs are cheap index trackers. NMB goes the other way: an actively managed muni portfolio run by credit specialists, with an options-selling sleeve stacked on top for extra income.
VCRM Vanguard's active answer in a mostly-index category: managers working the whole muni curve for 0.12% a year, under half the muni ETF median fee. Monthly income, exempt from federal personal income taxes.
Stated mandate
NMB The fund’s current stated objective is to maximize total return.
VCRM The fund seeks total return through current income exempt from federal personal income taxes and capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NMB vs VCRM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NMB vs VCRM Cost
Overpaying NMB vs VCRM
$8,016
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NMB 0.53%
$10,536
VCRM 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NMB | VCRM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $953 | $220 | $733 |
| 20 | $3,658 | $859 | $2,799 |
| 30 | $10,536 | $2,520 | $8,016 |
- 0.53%NMB
- 0.12%VCRM, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
VCRM 8th cheapest of 63 funds
NMB 57th cheapest of 63 funds
NMB vs VCRM Dividends
- NMB 5.40%, better
- VCRM 3.81%
- NMB $1.29
- VCRM $2.82
- NMB $0.08
- VCRM $0.21
- NMB Oct 27, 2026
- VCRM Oct 1, 2026
- NMB Oct 30, 2026
- VCRM Oct 5, 2026
- NMB Monthly
- VCRM Monthly
Distribution history
NMB vs VCRM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NMB 11.1%VCRM 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- NMB −0.13VCRM −0.32
- Worst fall
- NMB −13.7%VCRM −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- NMB 0.41VCRM 0.17
Popular comparisons
- 0.53% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.