Skip to content
etf.net

NOVM vs PMJN

FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - November

NOVMDCboe

PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June

PMJNBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

PMJN −0.35pt a year

NOVM0.85%PMJN0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

PMJN 4.4×the volume

NOVM1.12KPMJN4.9K

NOVM vs PMJN Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+6.1%NOVM+4.3%PMJN

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. NOVM +6.1%. PMJN +4.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%1%2%3%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
NOVM 0.85%
PMJN 0.50%, better
Fund size
NOVM $27M
PMJN $10M
1Y total return
NOVM +6.1%, better
PMJN +4.3%
Holdings
NOVM 3
PMJN 4
Avg volume (30D)
NOVM 1.12K sh
PMJN 4.9K sh, better
NAV per share
NOVM $34.39
PMJN $27.11
52W range

ETF.net Grade

NOVM: Cost 21, Risk 56, Mission not scored, Tradability 26, Holdings not scored, Durability 71. PMJN: Cost 76, Risk 36, Mission not scored, Tradability 41, Holdings not scored, Durability 36.
Pillar letters and Scores for NOVM, PMJN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarNOVMPMJN
Cost30% weightF21A76Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB56HigherD36
Tradability15% weightD26C41Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA71HigherD36

Rank among S&P 500 Max Buffer funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. NOVM and PMJN are both graded against the same 20 S&P 500 Max Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Max Buffer⁠

Category · 20 funds
See all 20 ›

PMJN ranks 4th and NOVM 20th of 20 funds in the S&P 500 Max Buffer Category.

  1. Rank 1BPMDEPGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - DecemberScore 63
  2. Rank 2BPMJLPGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - JulyScore 56
  3. Rank 2BPMSEPGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - SeptemberScore 56
  4. Rank 4BPMJNPGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - JuneScore 55
  5. Rank 4CPMMRPGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - MarchScore 55
  6. Rank 19DJANMFT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - JanuaryScore 36
  7. Rank 20DNOVMFT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - NovemberScore 34

NOVM vs PMJN Holdings

How NOVM and PMJN differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of NOVM and 0.0% of PMJN.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%

Sector

No Sector split for NOVM and PMJN.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for PMJN.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • NOVM107.9%
  • PMJN102.9%

Securities held

  • NOVM2
  • PMJN3

Asset class

NOVM
Multi-Asset
PMJN
Alternatives

Holdings

  • Only in NOVM2
  • In both0
  • Only in PMJN3

Only in NOVM

2 securities, 100% of NOVM by weight

  • 2026-11-20 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 6.57107.48%
  • 2026-11-20 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 659.010.15%

Only in PMJN

3 securities, 100% of PMJN by weight

  • 4SPY Us 05/28/27 C15.1397.74%
  • 4SPY Us 05/28/27 P756.483.31%
  • Net Current Assets<0.01%

Weight gaps

NOVM and PMJN share no securities.

All 4 NOVM holdings⁠All PMJN holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

NOVM vs PMJN Cost

Overpaying NOVM vs PMJN

$6,220

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • NOVM 0.85%

    $16,199

  • PMJN 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • NOVM 0.85%
  • PMJN 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530NOVM $16,199PMJN $9,979

Year by year

YearNOVMPMJNOverpaying
10$1,508$900$608
20$5,706$3,460$2,246
30$16,199$9,979$6,220

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%NOVM
  • 0.50%PMJN, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Max Buffer funds
  • Median 0.52%

PMJN cheapest of 20 funds

NOVM 12th cheapest of 20 funds

NOVM vs PMJN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
NOVM None
PMJN None

Distribution history

NOVMAll NOVM payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PMJNAll PMJN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

NOVM vs PMJN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
NOVM 2.6%since Dec 2024PMJN 1.5%since Jul 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
NOVM 0.77since Dec 2024PMJN 0.64since Jul 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
NOVM −3.3%since Nov 2024PMJN −1.1%since Jun 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
NOVM 0.20PMJN 0.11

Popular comparisons

  • NOVMDvsPMDEB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - November · PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PMJNBvsPMDEB

    PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June · PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NOVMDvsPMJLB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - November · PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PMJNBvsPMJLB

    PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June · PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NOVMDvsPMSEB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - November · PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - September

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PMJNBvsPMSEB

    PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June · PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - September

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.