SCHZ ranks 2nd and NUAG 30th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
NUAG vs SCHZ
SCHZ −0.13pt a year
0.16%0.03%
SCHZ 72.9×the volume
32.5K2.37M
NUAG +0.4pt
+1.6%+1.2%
NUAG vs SCHZ Performance
+0.5%−1.0%
- NUAG 0.16%
- SCHZ 0.03%, better
- NUAG $131M
- SCHZ $10.8B
- NUAG −0.4%
- SCHZ −0.2%, better
- NUAG 4.60%, better
- SCHZ 4.27%
- NUAG 1569
- SCHZ 12610
- NUAG 32.5K sh
- SCHZ 2.37M sh, better
- NUAG $20.36
- SCHZ $22.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NUAG | SCHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B56Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | D36 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | B67 | A78Higher |
| Durability | B59 | A88Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. NUAG and SCHZ are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NUAGA
SCHZA
In short
NUAG The Agg, re-sorted for income. NUAG tracks an ICE BofA index that takes the same investment-grade universe and tilts weight toward its higher-yielding corners, with rules fencing in how far duration and credit quality can drift. Fee: 0.16%.
SCHZ Schwab's core bond holding: the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market, over 10,000 issues deep, for 0.03% a year. That is the floor of a category whose median fee is more than ten times higher. Running since 2011, pays monthly.
Stated mandate
NUAG The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the investment results of the ICE BofA Enhanced Yield U.S. Broad Bond Index.
SCHZ The fund seeks to track the total return of an index representing the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NUAG vs SCHZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NUAG vs SCHZ Cost
Overpaying NUAG vs SCHZ
$2,704
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NUAG 0.16%
$3,342
SCHZ 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NUAG | SCHZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $292 | $55 | $237 |
| 20 | $1,141 | $216 | $925 |
| 30 | $3,342 | $638 | $2,704 |
- 0.16%NUAG
- 0.03%SCHZ, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SCHZ 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
NUAG 27th cheapest of 114 funds
NUAG vs SCHZ Dividends
- NUAG 4.60%, better
- SCHZ 4.27%
- NUAG $0.93
- SCHZ $0.96
- NUAG $0.08
- SCHZ $0.08
- NUAG Oct 1, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 1, 2026
- NUAG Oct 2, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 7, 2026
- NUAG Monthly
- SCHZ Monthly
Distribution history
NUAG vs SCHZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- NUAG
- SCHZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NUAG 5.7%SCHZ 5.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- NUAG 0.26, betterSCHZ 0.17
- Worst fall
- NUAG −18.6%SCHZ −17.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- NUAG 0.99SCHZ 0.99Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
NUAG and SCHZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.16% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
