SCYB ranks 1st and NUHY 25th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
NUHY vs SCYB
SCYB −0.27pt a year
0.30%0.03%
SCYB 46.3×the volume
23.8K1.1M
SCYB +0.2pt
+8.2%+8.4%
NUHY vs SCYB Performance
+0.7%+2.0%
- NUHY 0.30%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- NUHY $109M
- SCYB $2.8B
- NUHY +0.7%
- SCYB +2.0%, better
- NUHY 7.04%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- NUHY 387
- SCYB 1844
- NUHY 23.8K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- NUHY $20.40
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NUHY | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A75 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A98 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C47 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | C45 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | B57 | A99Higher |
| Durability | C42 | B68Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. NUHY and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NUHYB
SCYBA
In short
NUHY High yield with a conscience filter. NUHY tracks a Bloomberg MSCI index that screens junk-bond issuers on ESG data and leans toward the market's more tradable corners, at a fee below what the typical high-yield ETF charges.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
NUHY The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the investment results of the Bloomberg MSCI U.S. High Yield Very Liquid ESG Select Index.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NUHY vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NUHY vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying NUHY vs SCYB
$5,511
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NUHY 0.30%
$6,149
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NUHY | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $55 | $490 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $216 | $1,897 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $638 | $5,511 |
- 0.30%NUHY
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
NUHY 21st cheapest of 84 funds
NUHY vs SCYB Dividends
- NUHY 7.04%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- NUHY $1.44
- SCYB $1.80
- NUHY $0.12
- SCYB $0.16
- NUHY Oct 1, 2026
- SCYB Oct 1, 2026
- NUHY Oct 2, 2026
- SCYB Oct 7, 2026
- NUHY Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
NUHY vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NUHY 5.2%SCYB 4.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- NUHY 0.70SCYB 0.82, better
- Worst fall
- NUHY −16.8%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- NUHY 0.72SCYB 0.28
NUHY and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
