SCMB ranks 2nd and NUMI 29th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
NUMI vs SCMB
SCMB −0.27pt a year
0.30%0.03%
SCMB 128.4×the volume
25.5K3.28M
NUMI vs SCMB Performance
+0.1%−0.6%
- NUMI 0.30%
- SCMB 0.03%, better
- NUMI $92M
- SCMB $4.07B
- NUMI +0.1%, better
- SCMB −0.6%
- NUMI 3.50%
- SCMB 3.70%, better
- NUMI 304
- SCMB 8203
- NUMI 25.5K sh
- SCMB 3.28M sh, better
- NUMI $24.33
- SCMB $24.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NUMI | SCMB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C48 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A81 | A96Higher |
| Risk | D39 | B57Higher |
| Tradability | C53 | A82Higher |
| Holdings | A79 | A81Higher |
| Durability | C40 | A72Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. NUMI and SCMB are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NUMIB
SCMBA
In short
NUMI Nuveen underwrote its first municipal bond in 1898. NUMI packs that credit desk into an ETF: roughly 300 mostly investment-grade munis, tilted long, hunting undervalued yield, and paying tax-exempt income monthly for 0.30%.
SCMB Schwab's take on the core muni sleeve: three basis points, thousands of AMT-free bonds from across the country, and a monthly distribution. Bottom-of-the-table pricing, no frills attached.
Stated mandate
NUMI The Fund invests at least 80% of its net assets in municipal securities whose interest is exempt from federal income taxes.
SCMB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of an index representing the U.S. AMT-free municipal bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NUMI vs SCMB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NUMI vs SCMB Cost
Overpaying NUMI vs SCMB
$5,511
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NUMI 0.30%
$6,149
SCMB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NUMI | SCMB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $55 | $490 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $216 | $1,897 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $638 | $5,511 |
- 0.30%NUMI
- 0.03%SCMB, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
SCMB cheapest of 63 funds
NUMI 30th cheapest of 63 funds
NUMI vs SCMB Dividends
- NUMI 3.50%
- SCMB 3.70%, better
- NUMI $0.85
- SCMB $0.92
- NUMI $0.07
- SCMB $0.09
- NUMI Oct 1, 2026
- SCMB Oct 1, 2026
- NUMI Oct 2, 2026
- SCMB Oct 7, 2026
- NUMI Monthly
- SCMB Monthly
Distribution history
NUMI vs SCMB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NUMI 6.5%SCMB 5.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- NUMI −0.31SCMB −0.04
- Worst fall
- NUMI −7.3%SCMB −6.7%
- Market sensitivity
- NUMI 0.16SCMB 0.96
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.