XHLF ranks 7th and NUSB 32nd of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
NUSB vs XHLF
XHLF −0.14pt a year
0.17%0.03%
XHLF 58.3×the volume
5.21K304K
NUSB vs XHLF Performance
+3.9%+3.6%
- NUSB 0.17%
- XHLF 0.03%, better
- NUSB $155M
- XHLF $2.03B
- NUSB +3.9%, better
- XHLF +3.6%
- NUSB 4.16%, better
- XHLF 3.68%
- NUSB 140
- XHLF 29
- NUSB 5.21K sh
- XHLF 304K sh, better
- NUSB $25.15
- XHLF $50.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NUSB | XHLF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C54 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C46Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | C43 | A78Higher |
| Holdings | A72Higher | D32 |
| Durability | D37 | B59Higher |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. NUSB and XHLF are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NUSBB
XHLFA
In short
NUSB Nuveen's 2024 entry in the cash-parking aisle: an actively run bond fund that keeps duration near a year or less, leans investment grade, pays monthly, and charges less than the typical ultra-short ETF.
XHLF Most cash-parking funds pick a maturity bucket. XHLF picks a number: it blends Treasury bills to an average duration of about six months, resets to that target monthly, and charges three basis points to do it.
Stated mandate
NUSB The actively managed ETF seeks total return consistent with preservation of capital. It invests at least 80% in income-producing fixed-income securities, primarily investment grade, while seeking duration of one year or less, except that duration may reach two years in certain market conditions.
XHLF The Fund seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. Treasury securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NUSB vs XHLF Holdings
How NUSB and XHLF differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
- Country85.3%
Sector
No Sector split for XHLF.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in NUSBMore in XHLF | Gap | NUSB | XHLF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | XHLF +14.7 points | 85.3% | 100.0% | |
| Canada | NUSB +7.4 points | 7.4% | 0.0% | |
| Denmark | NUSB +2.1 points | 2.1% | 0.0% | |
| Australia | NUSB +1.8 points | 1.8% | 0.0% | |
| Sweden | NUSB +1.1 points | 1.1% | 0.0% | |
| Spain | NUSB +1.0 points | 1.0% | 0.0% | |
| Netherlands | NUSB +0.7 points | 0.7% | 0.0% | |
| Ireland | NUSB +0.7 points | 0.7% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- NUSB14.2%
- XHLF79.3%
- NUSB140
- XHLF29
Asset class
- NUSB
- Fixed Income
- XHLF
- Fixed Income
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. NUSB holds 140 securities, XHLF 29.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NUSB vs XHLF Cost
Overpaying NUSB vs XHLF
$2,908
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NUSB 0.17%
$3,546
XHLF 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NUSB | XHLF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $310 | $55 | $255 |
| 20 | $1,211 | $216 | $995 |
| 30 | $3,546 | $638 | $2,908 |
- 0.17%NUSB
- 0.03%XHLF, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
XHLF cheapest of 78 funds
NUSB 33rd cheapest of 78 funds
NUSB vs XHLF Dividends
- NUSB 4.16%, better
- XHLF 3.68%
- NUSB $1.05
- XHLF $1.85
- NUSB $0.09
- XHLF $0.16
- NUSB Nov 2, 2026
- XHLF Nov 2, 2026
- NUSB Nov 3, 2026
- XHLF Pays Nov 5, 2026
- NUSB Monthly
- XHLF Monthly
Distribution history
NUSB vs XHLF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NUSB 0.4%XHLF 0.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- NUSB 0.76XHLF −0.50
- Worst fall
- NUSB −0.2%XHLF −0.1%
- Market sensitivity
- NUSB 0.01XHLF 0.03
Popular comparisons
- 0.17% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.