PSFD ranks 2nd and NVBW 15th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.
NVBW vs PSFD
0.0%by weight
PSFD −0.25pt a year
0.74%0.49%
NVBW 5.9×the volume
5.35K905
PSFD +5.2pt
+11.1%+16.3%
NVBW vs PSFD Performance
+10.0%+11.4%
- NVBW 0.74%
- PSFD 0.49%, better
- NVBW $97M
- PSFD $60M
- NVBW +10.0%
- PSFD +11.4%, better
- NVBW 2
- PSFD 4
- NVBW 5.35K sh, better
- PSFD 905 sh
- NVBW $37.06
- PSFD $40.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NVBW | PSFD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D37 | A85Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C47Higher | D30 |
| Tradability | B59Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | B58 | |
| Durability | B57 | B69Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
Same Category. NVBW and PSFD are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NVBWC
PSFDB
In short
NVBW An insurance hedging desk in ETF form: NVBW absorbs the first 20% of a year's losses in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, and in exchange your upside stops at a cap reset each November.
PSFD Absorbs the first 20% of a drop in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over each 12-month period, with your upside capped in exchange. One of the original 2020 Pacer/Swan buffer funds, and priced under most deep-buffer rivals.
Stated mandate
NVBW The Fund seeks to track the share-price returns of the SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust over its one-year Outcome Period up to an upside cap, while buffering the first 20% of losses in the Underlying ETF.
PSFD The fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while mitigating specified downside losses through a structured buffer strategy over an approximately one-year period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NVBW vs PSFD Holdings
How NVBW and PSFD differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of NVBW and 0.0% of PSFD.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in NVBWMore in PSFD | NVBW | PSFD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | Same weight | 40.1% | 40.1% |
| Financials | Same weight | 11.3% | 11.3% |
| Communication | Same weight | 9.9% | 9.9% |
| Health Care | Same weight | 9.4% | 9.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 8.7% | 8.7% |
| Industrials | Same weight | 7.6% | 7.6% |
| Consumer Staples | Same weight | 4.4% | 4.4% |
| Energy | Same weight | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| Utilities | Same weight | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Materials | Same weight | 1.6% | 1.6% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in NVBWMore in PSFD | NVBW | PSFD |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- NVBW101.5%
- PSFD102.6%
- NVBW2
- PSFD3
Asset class
- NVBW
- Equity
- PSFD
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in NVBW2
- In both0
- Only in PSFD3
Only in NVBW
2 securities, 100% of NVBW by weight
- Spy 10/30/2026 5.12 C101.51%
- Spy 10/30/2026 682.13 P<0.01%
Only in PSFD
3 securities, 100% of PSFD by weight
- Spy 12/31/2026 7.64 C101.88%
- Spy 12/31/2026 681.92 P0.45%
- Spy 12/31/2026 409.15 P0.03%
Weight gaps
NVBW and PSFD share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NVBW vs PSFD Cost
Overpaying NVBW vs PSFD
$4,515
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NVBW 0.74%
$14,307
PSFD 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NVBW | PSFD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $883 | $436 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $3,394 | $1,621 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $9,792 | $4,515 |
- 0.74%NVBW
- 0.49%PSFD, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
- Median 0.74%
PSFD cheapest of 24 funds
NVBW 10th cheapest of 24 funds
NVBW vs PSFD Dividends
- NVBW None
- PSFD None
Distribution history
NVBW vs PSFD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NVBW 4.6%, betterPSFD 7.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- NVBW 1.35PSFD 1.50, better
- Worst fall
- NVBW −8.4%PSFD −14.9%
- Market sensitivity
- NVBW 0.40PSFD 0.56
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
