SCHZ ranks 2nd and NXUS 37th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
NXUS vs SCHZ
SCHZ −0.05pt a year
0.08%0.03%
SCHZ 15.1×the volume
157K2.37M
NXUS vs SCHZ Performance
−0.6%−0.2%
- NXUS 0.08%
- SCHZ 0.03%, better
- NXUS $4.03B
- SCHZ $10.8B
- NXUS −0.6%
- SCHZ −0.2%, better
- NXUS
- SCHZ 4.27%
- NXUS 3301
- SCHZ 12610
- NXUS 157K sh
- SCHZ 2.37M sh, better
- NXUS $24.43
- SCHZ $22.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NXUS | SCHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | C47 | C47 |
| Tradability | C40 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | A93Higher | A78 |
| Durability | C52 | A88Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. NXUS and SCHZ are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NXUSB
SCHZA
In short
NXUS Most "aggregate bond" ETFs stop at the US border. NXUS starts there: roughly 3,200 investment-grade bonds from developed and emerging markets, none of them in dollars, with the currency risk hedged back to USD monthly, for 0.08% a year.
SCHZ Schwab's core bond holding: the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market, over 10,000 issues deep, for 0.03% a year. That is the floor of a category whose median fee is more than ten times higher. Running since 2011, pays monthly.
Stated mandate
NXUS The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD (Hedged) Index. Its strategy may also use debt securities outside the Index, including asset-backed securities.
SCHZ The fund seeks to track the total return of an index representing the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NXUS vs SCHZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NXUS vs SCHZ Cost
Overpaying NXUS vs SCHZ
$1,051
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NXUS 0.08%
$1,689
SCHZ 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NXUS | SCHZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $55 | $92 |
| 20 | $575 | $216 | $359 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $638 | $1,051 |
- 0.08%NXUS
- 0.03%SCHZ, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SCHZ 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
NXUS 15th cheapest of 114 funds
NXUS vs SCHZ Dividends
- NXUS
- SCHZ 4.27%
- NXUS
- SCHZ $0.96
- NXUS $0.07
- SCHZ $0.08
- NXUS Oct 1, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 1, 2026
- NXUS Oct 2, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 7, 2026
- NXUS Monthly
- SCHZ Monthly
Distribution history
NXUS vs SCHZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NXUS 3.8%SCHZ 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- NXUS −0.90SCHZ 0.17
- Worst fall
- NXUS −3.1%SCHZ −17.5%
- Market sensitivity
- NXUS 0.14SCHZ 0.99
NXUS and SCHZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

