SCHK ranks 2nd and NZAC 19th of 41 funds in the Other Major Indexes Category.
NZAC vs SCHK
SCHK −0.09pt a year
0.12%0.03%
SCHK 239.8×the volume
5.76K1.38M
SCHK +2.4pt
+8.4%+10.8%
NZAC vs SCHK Performance
+49.4%+66.8%
- NZAC 0.12%
- SCHK 0.03%, better
- NZAC $188M
- SCHK $5.53B
- NZAC +9.7%
- SCHK +13.3%, better
- NZAC 2.06%, better
- SCHK 1.06%
- NZAC 644
- SCHK 998
- NZAC 5.76K sh
- SCHK 1.38M sh, better
- NZAC $44.72
- SCHK $35.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NZAC | SCHK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B62 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | D34 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | B65Higher | B58 |
| Durability | A72Higher | B68 |
Rank among Other Major Indexes funds
Same Category. NZAC and SCHK are both graded against the same 41 Other Major Indexes funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NZACB
SCHKA
In short
NZAC A whole-world stock index fund with a climate filter baked in: large and mid caps across developed and emerging markets, screened for climate risk, at 0.12% a year. A Paris-aligned mandate priced like plain vanilla.
SCHK Schwab's house-built alternative to the S&P 500: the 1,000 largest US companies in one passive wrapper, reaching past the mega-caps into mid-cap turf, priced at three basis points.
Stated mandate
NZAC The fund seeks to track the MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned Index, an equity index covering large- and mid-cap companies in developed and emerging markets. Its methodology is designed to reduce physical and transition climate risks and increase exposure to opportunities from the transition to a lower-carbon economy.
SCHK The fund seeks to track the total return of the Schwab 1000 Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NZAC vs SCHK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NZAC vs SCHK Cost
Overpaying NZAC vs SCHK
$1,882
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NZAC 0.12%
$2,520
SCHK 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NZAC | SCHK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $220 | $55 | $165 |
| 20 | $859 | $216 | $643 |
| 30 | $2,520 | $638 | $1,882 |
- 0.12%NZAC
- 0.03%SCHK, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Major Indexes funds
- Median 0.29%
SCHK cheapest of 41 funds
NZAC 13th cheapest of 41 funds
NZAC vs SCHK Dividends
- NZAC 2.06%, better
- SCHK 1.06%
- NZAC $0.94
- SCHK $0.38
- NZAC $0.30
- SCHK $0.10
- NZAC Jun 1, 2026
- SCHK Sep 23, 2026
- NZAC Jun 5, 2026
- SCHK Sep 28, 2026
- NZAC Twice a year
- SCHK Quarterly
Distribution history
NZAC vs SCHK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- NZAC
- SCHK
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NZAC 12.2%, betterSCHK 12.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- NZAC 1.23SCHK 1.39, better
- Worst fall
- NZAC −28.3%SCHK −25.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- NZAC 1.01SCHK 1.02
Popular comparisons
- 0.12% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.