SPYV ranks 1st and NZAC 19th of 41 funds in the Other Major Indexes Category.
NZAC vs SPYV
SPYV −0.08pt a year
0.12%0.04%
SPYV 397.7×the volume
5.76K2.29M
SPYV +0.3pt
+11.8%+12.1%
NZAC vs SPYV Performance
+49.4%+71.8%
- NZAC 0.12%
- SPYV 0.04%, better
- NZAC $188M
- SPYV $37.9B
- NZAC +9.7%
- SPYV +17.6%, better
- NZAC 2.06%, better
- SPYV 1.64%
- NZAC 644
- SPYV 436
- NZAC 5.76K sh
- SPYV 2.29M sh, better
- NZAC $44.72
- SPYV $63.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NZAC | SPYV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A87 | |
| Risk | B62 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | D34 | A97Higher |
| Holdings | B65 | A72Higher |
| Durability | A72 | A86Higher |
Rank among Other Major Indexes funds
Same Category. NZAC and SPYV are both graded against the same 41 Other Major Indexes funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NZACB
SPYVA
In short
NZAC A whole-world stock index fund with a climate filter baked in: large and mid caps across developed and emerging markets, screened for climate risk, at 0.12% a year. A Paris-aligned mandate priced like plain vanilla.
SPYV The value side of the S&P 500, tracked since 2000 for four basis points. It does one thing: hold the index names that screen cheap, and charge close to nothing for the privilege.
Stated mandate
NZAC The fund seeks to track the MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned Index, an equity index covering large- and mid-cap companies in developed and emerging markets. Its methodology is designed to reduce physical and transition climate risks and increase exposure to opportunities from the transition to a lower-carbon economy.
SPYV The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the S&P 500 Value Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NZAC vs SPYV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NZAC vs SPYV Cost
Overpaying NZAC vs SPYV
$1,671
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NZAC 0.12%
$2,520
SPYV 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NZAC | SPYV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $220 | $73 | $147 |
| 20 | $859 | $288 | $571 |
| 30 | $2,520 | $849 | $1,671 |
- 0.12%NZAC
- 0.04%SPYV, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Major Indexes funds
- Median 0.29%
SPYV 2nd cheapest of 41 funds
NZAC 13th cheapest of 41 funds
NZAC vs SPYV Dividends
- NZAC 2.06%, better
- SPYV 1.64%
- NZAC $0.94
- SPYV $1.06
- NZAC $0.30
- SPYV $0.27
- NZAC Jun 1, 2026
- SPYV Sep 21, 2026
- NZAC Jun 5, 2026
- SPYV Sep 23, 2026
- NZAC Twice a year
- SPYV Quarterly
Distribution history
NZAC vs SPYV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- NZAC
- SPYV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NZAC 12.2%SPYV 11.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- NZAC 1.23, betterSPYV 1.17
- Worst fall
- NZAC −28.3%SPYV −17.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- NZAC 1.01SPYV 0.83
NZAC and SPYV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

