PBUS ranks 3rd and NZAC 19th of 41 funds in the Other Major Indexes Category.
NZAC vs PBUS
PBUS −0.08pt a year
0.12%0.04%
PBUS 60.5×the volume
5.76K349K
PBUS +2.7pt
+8.4%+11.1%
NZAC vs PBUS Performance
+49.4%+68.9%
- NZAC 0.12%
- PBUS 0.04%, better
- NZAC $188M
- PBUS $10.2B
- NZAC +9.7%
- PBUS +12.9%, better
- NZAC 2.06%, better
- PBUS 1.02%
- NZAC 644
- PBUS 516
- NZAC 5.76K sh
- PBUS 349K sh, better
- NZAC $44.72
- PBUS $73.60
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NZAC | PBUS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B62Higher | B61 |
| Tradability | D34 | A77Higher |
| Holdings | B65Higher | C52 |
| Durability | A72 | A74Higher |
Rank among Other Major Indexes funds
Same Category. NZAC and PBUS are both graded against the same 41 Other Major Indexes funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NZACB
PBUSA
In short
NZAC A whole-world stock index fund with a climate filter baked in: large and mid caps across developed and emerging markets, screened for climate risk, at 0.12% a year. A Paris-aligned mandate priced like plain vanilla.
PBUS Roughly 500 US stocks for 0.04% a year, benchmarked to the MSCI USA Index instead of the S&P 500. Invesco's rules-based core holding, running since 2017.
Stated mandate
NZAC The fund seeks to track the MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned Index, an equity index covering large- and mid-cap companies in developed and emerging markets. Its methodology is designed to reduce physical and transition climate risks and increase exposure to opportunities from the transition to a lower-carbon economy.
PBUS The Fund tracks the MSCI USA Index and commits at least 90% of its assets to securities included in that index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NZAC vs PBUS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NZAC vs PBUS Cost
Overpaying NZAC vs PBUS
$1,671
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NZAC 0.12%
$2,520
PBUS 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NZAC | PBUS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $220 | $73 | $147 |
| 20 | $859 | $288 | $571 |
| 30 | $2,520 | $849 | $1,671 |
- 0.12%NZAC
- 0.04%PBUS, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Major Indexes funds
- Median 0.29%
PBUS 2nd cheapest of 41 funds
NZAC 13th cheapest of 41 funds
NZAC vs PBUS Dividends
- NZAC 2.06%, better
- PBUS 1.02%
- NZAC $0.94
- PBUS $0.77
- NZAC $0.30
- PBUS $0.19
- NZAC Jun 1, 2026
- PBUS Sep 21, 2026
- NZAC Jun 5, 2026
- PBUS Sep 25, 2026
- NZAC Twice a year
- PBUS Quarterly
Distribution history
NZAC vs PBUS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- NZAC
- PBUS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NZAC 12.2%, betterPBUS 12.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- NZAC 1.23PBUS 1.41, better
- Worst fall
- NZAC −28.3%PBUS −25.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- NZAC 1.01PBUS 1.02
Popular comparisons
- 0.12% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.