SMLV ranks 4th and ONEV 5th of 16 funds in the US Low Volatility Index Category.
ONEV vs SMLV
SMLV −0.08pt a year
0.20%0.12%
ONEV 5.0×the volume
17.5K3.51K
ONEV +1.6pt
+11.9%+10.3%
ONEV vs SMLV Performance
+52.3%+52.2%
- ONEV 0.20%
- SMLV 0.12%, better
- ONEV $287M
- SMLV $260M
- ONEV +17.6%
- SMLV +25.8%, better
- ONEV 1.85%
- SMLV 2.34%, better
- ONEV 450
- SMLV 393
- ONEV 17.5K sh, better
- SMLV 3.51K sh
- ONEV $150.49
- SMLV $156.67
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ONEV | SMLV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | A90Higher |
| Mission | A98Higher | B69 |
| Risk | C51Higher | C40 |
| Tradability | B64Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | A76 | A79Higher |
| Durability | B62Higher | C53 |
Rank among US Low Volatility Index funds
Same Category. ONEV and SMLV are both graded against the same 16 US Low Volatility Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ONEVB
SMLVB
In short
ONEV Low volatility with a valuation check. ONEV tracks a Russell 1000 index that leans defensive but also screens for quality and value, so the calm names it holds still have to look reasonably priced.
SMLV Low volatility is usually a large-cap game. SMLV runs the same calm-stocks screen down where the swings actually live: US small caps, roughly 400 of them, for 0.12% a year.
Stated mandate
ONEV The fund seeks to track the total return of the Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor Index before fees and expenses.
SMLV The fund's advertised mandate is exposure to U.S. small-capitalization companies selected for low volatility.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ONEV vs SMLV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ONEV vs SMLV Cost
Overpaying ONEV vs SMLV
$1,635
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ONEV 0.20%
$4,155
SMLV 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ONEV | SMLV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $220 | $145 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $859 | $562 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $2,520 | $1,635 |
- 0.20%ONEV
- 0.12%SMLV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Low Volatility Index funds
- Median 0.20%
SMLV 2nd cheapest of 16 funds
ONEV 8th cheapest of 16 funds
ONEV vs SMLV Dividends
- ONEV 1.85%
- SMLV 2.34%, better
- ONEV $2.79
- SMLV $3.63
- ONEV $0.74
- SMLV $0.97
- ONEV Sep 21, 2026
- SMLV Sep 21, 2026
- ONEV Sep 23, 2026
- SMLV Sep 23, 2026
- ONEV Quarterly
- SMLV Quarterly
Distribution history
ONEV vs SMLV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ONEV
- SMLV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ONEV 13.1%, betterSMLV 17.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- ONEV 0.89SMLV 0.94, better
- Worst fall
- ONEV −18.5%, betterSMLV −20.4%
- Market sensitivity
- ONEV 0.71SMLV 0.80
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.