QLV ranks 2nd and ONEV 5th of 16 funds in the US Low Volatility Index Category.
ONEV vs QLV
QLV −0.12pt a year
0.20%0.08%
ONEV 2.0×the volume
17.5K8.83K
QLV +1.5pt
+8.8%+10.3%
ONEV vs QLV Performance
+52.3%+63.3%
- ONEV 0.20%
- QLV 0.08%, better
- ONEV $287M
- QLV $189M
- ONEV +17.6%, better
- QLV +17.0%
- ONEV 1.85%, better
- QLV 1.43%
- ONEV 450
- QLV 122
- ONEV 17.5K sh, better
- QLV 8.83K sh
- ONEV $150.49
- QLV $82.16
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ONEV | QLV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A98Higher | A76 |
| Risk | C51 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | B64 | B67Higher |
| Holdings | A76Higher | D34 |
| Durability | B62Higher | D31 |
Rank among US Low Volatility Index funds
Same Category. ONEV and QLV are both graded against the same 16 US Low Volatility Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ONEVB
QLVA
In short
ONEV Low volatility with a valuation check. ONEV tracks a Russell 1000 index that leans defensive but also screens for quality and value, so the calm names it holds still have to look reasonably priced.
QLV Low vol with a quality gate: the index cuts the weakest-scoring fifth of US large and mid caps, then optimizes what's left for calm. Fee is 0.08% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
ONEV The fund seeks to track the total return of the Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor Index before fees and expenses.
QLV The fund seeks to track the Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index and provide exposure to U.S. companies selected for lower overall volatility and quality characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ONEV vs QLV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ONEV vs QLV Cost
Overpaying ONEV vs QLV
$2,466
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ONEV 0.20%
$4,155
QLV 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ONEV | QLV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $147 | $218 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $575 | $846 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $1,689 | $2,466 |
- 0.20%ONEV
- 0.08%QLV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Low Volatility Index funds
- Median 0.20%
QLV cheapest of 16 funds
ONEV 8th cheapest of 16 funds
ONEV vs QLV Dividends
- ONEV 1.85%, better
- QLV 1.43%
- ONEV $2.79
- QLV $1.18
- ONEV $0.74
- QLV $0.28
- ONEV Sep 21, 2026
- QLV Sep 18, 2026
- ONEV Sep 23, 2026
- QLV Sep 24, 2026
- ONEV Quarterly
- QLV Quarterly
Distribution history
ONEV vs QLV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ONEV
- QLV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ONEV 13.1%QLV 8.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ONEV 0.89QLV 1.56, better
- Worst fall
- ONEV −18.5%QLV −17.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ONEV 0.71QLV 0.58
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.