Skip to content
etf.net

ONOF vs SPDF

Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF

ONOFANYSE Arca

Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF

SPDFCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ONOF −0.30pt a year

ONOF0.39%SPDF0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

SPDF 2.1×the volume

ONOF5.82KSPDF12.4K

ONOF vs SPDF Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+1.3%ONOF+1.1%SPDF

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. ONOF +1.3%. SPDF +1.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2%3%4%5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ONOF 0.39%, better
SPDF 0.69%
Fund size
ONOF $140M
SPDF $37M
1Y total return
ONOF +7.7%
SPDF No data
Yield (12M)
ONOF 1.22%
SPDF No data
Holdings
ONOF 504
SPDF 3
Avg volume (30D)
ONOF 5.82K sh
SPDF 12.4K sh, better
NAV per share
ONOF $40.37
SPDF $27.73
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ONOF: Cost 95, Risk 62, Mission not scored, Tradability 59, Holdings 76, Durability 56. SPDF: Cost 45, Risk 93, Mission not scored, Tradability 41, Holdings 38, Durability 10.
Pillar letters and Scores for ONOF, SPDF, with each pillar’s weight
PillarONOFSPDF
Cost30% weightA95HigherC45
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB62A93Higher
Tradability15% weightB59HigherC41
Holdings10% weightA76HigherD38
Durability5% weightB56HigherF10

Rank among Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ONOF and SPDF are both graded against the same 20 Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Trend-Following / Tactical Index⁠

Category · 20 funds
See all 20 ›

ONOF ranks 3rd and SPDF 10th of 20 funds in the Trend-Following / Tactical Index Category.

  1. Rank 1AWAMAWisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average FundScore 80
  2. Rank 2APTLCPacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3AONOFGlobal X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETFScore 75
  4. Rank 4APTMCPacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 9BPTINPacer Trendpilot International ETFScore 57
  6. Rank 10CSPDFDefender Risk Adaptive 500 ETFScore 50
  7. Rank 10CTHIRTHOR Index Rotation ETFScore 50

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ONOFAGlobal X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF

SPDFCDefender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF

In short

ONOF The ticker says it out loud: ONOF is an on/off switch. Four technical indicators decide whether it owns a broad basket of U.S. stocks or sits in short-term Treasuries. Rules, not hunches.

SPDF No data

Stated mandate

ONOF ONOF seeks to track the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Risk Management Index before fees and expenses. Its four technical indicators shift the Fund between U.S. equities and defensive short-term Treasuries.

SPDF No data

Why people hold it

  • ONOF 0.39% a year for a systematic tactical strategy, a fraction of what the typical fund in its tactical-allocation group charges.globalxetfs.com
  • The switch is mechanical. Four technical indicators on the underlying index move it between stocks and Treasuries, so the rulebook is public before you own it.globalxetfs.com
  • The defensive leg is boring on purpose: short-term U.S. Treasuries, not options overlays or shorting.globalxetfs.com
  • Risk-on means roughly 500 U.S. stocks, so the equity exposure is broad-market rather than a concentrated stock-picking bet.globalxetfs.com

SPDF No data

Worth knowing

  • ONOF Trend rules can whipsaw. In choppy markets the signals may step out after a drop and step back in after a bounce, and the fund's path can diverge sharply from the S&P 500.globalxetfs.com
  • It trades lightly compared with big index funds, so bid-ask spreads tend to be wider.
  • Launched in 2021, so its live record covers a short stretch of market history rather than multiple full cycles.

SPDF No data

Full ONOF profile⁠

Full SPDF profile⁠

ONOF vs SPDF Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ONOF vs SPDF Cost

Overpaying SPDF vs ONOF

$5,531

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ONOF 0.39%

    $7,898

  • SPDF 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ONOF 0.39%
  • SPDF 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530SPDF $13,429ONOF $7,898

Year by year

YearONOFSPDFOverpaying
10$705$1,232$527
20$2,725$4,697$1,972
30$7,898$13,429$5,531

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%ONOF, cheaper
  • 0.69%SPDF
  • Middle half of Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
  • Median 0.67%

ONOF 2nd cheapest of 20 funds

SPDF 11th cheapest of 20 funds

ONOF vs SPDF Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ONOF 1.22%
SPDF No data
Payout (12M)
ONOF $0.49
SPDF None
Last payment
ONOF $0.16
SPDF No data
Ex-dividend
ONOF Jun 29, 2026
SPDF No data
Paid on
ONOF Jul 2, 2026
SPDF No data
Frequency
ONOF Twice a year
SPDF No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

ONOFTwice a year · 11 paymentsAll ONOF payments⁠
One bar per payment. 11 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Jun 29, 2021 $0.09; Dec 30, 2021 $0.13; Jun 29, 2022 $0.18; Dec 29, 2022 $0.33; Jun 29, 2023 $0.18; Dec 28, 2023 $0.22; Jun 27, 2024 $0.12; Dec 30, 2024 $0.21; Jun 27, 2025 $0.19; Dec 30, 2025 $0.33; Jun 29, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
SPDFAll SPDF payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ONOF vs SPDF Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ONOF 12.0%SPDF No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ONOF 0.82SPDF No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ONOF −26.2%SPDF No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ONOF 0.96SPDF 0.99

ONOF and SPDF in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • ONOFAvsWAMAA

    Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF · WisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • SPDFCvsWAMAA

    Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF · WisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ONOFAvsPTLCA

    Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • SPDFCvsPTLCA

    Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ONOFAvsPTMCA

    Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • SPDFCvsPTMCA

    Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.