PANG ranks 3rd and PLU 272nd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
PANG vs PLU
PANG −0.66pt a year
0.76%1.42%
PLU 4.9×the volume
44.6K217K
PANG vs PLU Performance
−1.5%−67.5%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- PLU 1.42%
- PANG $9M
- PLU $5M
- PANG +76.3%
- PLU
- PANG 4
- PLU 9
- PANG 44.6K sh
- PLU 217K sh, better
- PANG $31.31
- PLU $2.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PANG | PLU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | F20 |
| Mission | A94Higher | A93 |
| Risk | A74Higher | D34 |
| Tradability | A74Higher | C44 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B59Higher | B56 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. PANG and PLU are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PANGA
PLUD
In short
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
PLU The first 2X daily ETF on Planet Labs, the satellite outfit that photographs the whole Earth every day. It aims for twice PL's daily percentage move and resets at every close, one trading day at a time.
Stated mandate
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
PLU The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to two times the daily percentage change in Planet Labs PBC’s share price, before fees and expenses. It is designed for short-term use and does not target results over periods longer than one trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PANG vs PLU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PANG vs PLU Cost
Overpaying PLU vs PANG
$10,481
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
PLU 1.42%
$25,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PANG | PLU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,353 | $2,460 | $1,107 |
| 20 | $5,142 | $9,074 | $3,932 |
| 30 | $14,656 | $25,137 | $10,481 |
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- 1.42%PLU
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
PLU 259th cheapest of 315 funds
PANG vs PLU Dividends
- PANG
- PLU None
- PANG $1.30
- PLU
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- PLU
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- PLU
- PANG Irregular
- PLU
Distribution history
PANG vs PLU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PANG 128.2%PLU
- Return per unit of risk
- PANG 0.90PLU
- Worst fall
- PANG −62.4%PLU
- Market sensitivity
- PANG 3.32PLU 6.70
Popular comparisons
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.42% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.42% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.42% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.