Skip to content

PCHI vs SCYB

Polen High Income ETF

PCHIFNYSE Arca

Schwab High Yield Bond ETF

SCYBANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

SCYB −0.50pt a year

PCHI0.53%SCYB0.03%

Avg volume · 30D

SCYB 90.1×the volume

PCHI12.7KSCYB1.14M

PCHI vs SCYB Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+0.7%PCHI+2.6%SCYB

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. PCHI +0.7%. SCYB +2.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2%4%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
PCHI 0.53%
SCYB 0.03%, better
Fund size
PCHI $6M
SCYB $2.73B
1Y total return
PCHI +0.7%
SCYB +2.6%, better
Yield (12M)
PCHI 9.28%, better
SCYB 7.16%
Holdings
PCHI 4
SCYB 1838
Avg volume (30D)
PCHI 12.7K sh
SCYB 1.14M sh, better
NAV per share
PCHI $23.03
SCYB $25.18
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PCHI: Cost 26, Risk 25, Mission 0, Tradability 25, Holdings 20, Durability 25. SCYB: Cost 100, Risk 60, Mission 100, Tradability 79, Holdings 99, Durability 68.
Pillar letters and Scores for PCHI, SCYB, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPCHISCYB
Cost30% weightD26A100Higher
Mission25% weightF0A100Higher
Risk15% weightD25B60Higher
Tradability15% weightD25A79Higher
Holdings10% weightF20A99Higher
Durability5% weightD25B68Higher

Rank among US High Yield funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PCHI and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US High Yield⁠

Category · 84 funds
See all 84 ›

SCYB ranks 1st and PCHI 79th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.

  1. Rank 1AHYLBXtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETFScore 89
  2. Rank 1ASCYBSchwab High Yield Bond ETFScore 89
  3. Rank 3ASPHYState Street SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETFScore 88
  4. Rank 78DDYLDLeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETFScore 27
  5. Rank 79FPCHIPolen High Income ETFScore 18
  6. Rank 80FJOJOATAC Credit Rotation ETFScore 16

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PCHIFPolen High Income ETF

SCYBASchwab High Yield Bond ETF

In short

PCHI No data

SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.

Stated mandate

PCHI No data

SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.

Why people hold it

PCHI No data

  • SCYB 0.03% a year against a category median of 0.40%. Even the cheap rivals sit above it: SPHY at 0.05%, USHY at 0.08%.
  • Tracks the same Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield index as BKHY, which charges 0.22%. Same map, cheaper toll.
  • Roughly 1,800 bonds, so no single issuer's blowup drives the outcome. Rules-based and passive, and it has hugged its index closely.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively and pays monthly, which matters in a corner of the market where getting out cheaply is half the job.

Worth knowing

PCHI No data

  • SCYB High yield means below-investment-grade credit. These bonds behave more like stocks than Treasuries when the economy sours, and the extra income is the payment for that risk.
  • Launched in 2023, so it has a shorter record than rivals that have traded through more credit cycles.
  • The strategy can hold derivatives alongside the bonds themselves to track the index, one layer beyond plain bond ownership.

Full PCHI profile⁠

Full SCYB profile⁠

PCHI vs SCYB Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PCHI vs SCYB Cost

Overpaying PCHI vs SCYB

$9,898

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PCHI 0.53%

    $10,536

  • SCYB 0.03%

    $638

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PCHI 0.53%
  • SCYB 0.03%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530PCHI $10,536SCYB $638

Year by year

YearPCHISCYBOverpaying
10$953$55$898
20$3,658$216$3,442
30$10,536$638$9,898

Expense ratio

  • 0.53%PCHI
  • 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
  • Middle half of US High Yield funds
  • Median 0.42%

SCYB cheapest of 84 funds

PCHI 63rd cheapest of 84 funds

PCHI vs SCYB Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
PCHI 9.28%, better
SCYB 7.16%
Payout (12M)
PCHI $2.14
SCYB $1.81
Last payment
PCHI $0.46
SCYB $0.16
Ex-dividend
PCHI Oct 30, 2026
SCYB Nov 2, 2026
Paid on
PCHI Nov 2, 2026
SCYB Nov 6, 2026
Frequency
PCHI Monthly
SCYB Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

PCHIMonthly · 20 paymentsAll PCHI payments⁠
One bar per payment. 20 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Mar 31, 2025 $0.0099; Apr 30, 2025 $0.07; May 30, 2025 $0.15; Jun 30, 2025 $0.16; Jul 31, 2025 $0.17; Aug 29, 2025 $0.15; Sep 30, 2025 $0.17; Oct 31, 2025 $0.17; Nov 28, 2025 $0.15; Dec 31, 2025 $0.20; Jan 30, 2026 $0.16; Feb 27, 2026 $0.15; Mar 31, 2026 $0.17; Apr 30, 2026 $0.16; May 29, 2026 $0.15; Jun 30, 2026 $0.16; Jul 31, 2026 $0.13; Aug 31, 2026 $0.11; Sep 30, 2026 $0.14; Oct 30, 2026 $0.46. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
SCYBMonthly · 39 paymentsAll SCYB payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Sep 1, 2023 $0.18; Oct 2, 2023 $0.17; Nov 1, 2023 $0.15; Dec 1, 2023 $0.18; Dec 15, 2023 $0.19; Feb 1, 2024 $0.13; Mar 1, 2024 $0.16; Apr 1, 2024 $0.16; May 1, 2024 $0.16; Jun 3, 2024 $0.17; Jul 1, 2024 $0.14; Aug 1, 2024 $0.16; Sep 3, 2024 $0.15; Oct 1, 2024 $0.15; Nov 1, 2024 $0.17; Dec 2, 2024 $0.15; Dec 20, 2024 $0.15; Feb 3, 2025 $0.17; Mar 3, 2025 $0.15; Apr 1, 2025 $0.14; May 1, 2025 $0.16; Jun 2, 2025 $0.16; Jul 1, 2025 $0.15; Aug 1, 2025 $0.16; Sep 2, 2025 $0.15; Oct 1, 2025 $0.15; Nov 3, 2025 $0.16; Dec 1, 2025 $0.14; Dec 19, 2025 $0.15; Feb 2, 2026 $0.16; Mar 2, 2026 $0.14; Apr 1, 2026 $0.15; May 1, 2026 $0.14; Jun 1, 2026 $0.15; Jul 1, 2026 $0.15; Aug 3, 2026 $0.15; Sep 1, 2026 $0.14; Oct 1, 2026 $0.16; Nov 2, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

PCHI vs SCYB Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PCHI 3.9%since Apr 2025SCYB 4.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PCHI −0.23since Apr 2025SCYB 0.82
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PCHI −6.4%since Mar 2025SCYB −4.9%since Jul 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PCHI 0.16SCYB 0.28

PCHI and SCYB in the news

Popular comparisons

  • PCHIFvsHYLBA

    Polen High Income ETF · Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.05%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCYBAvsSPHYA

    Schwab High Yield Bond ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.05%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PCHIFvsSPHYA

    Polen High Income ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.05%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCYBAvsUSHYA

    Schwab High Yield Bond ETF · iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PCHIFvsUSHYA

    Polen High Income ETF · iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCYBAvsHYLBA

    Schwab High Yield Bond ETF · Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.05%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.