XEMD ranks 2nd and PCY 10th of 17 funds in the Emerging Markets Bonds (US Dollar) Category.
PCY vs XEMD
XEMD −0.21pt a year
0.50%0.29%
PCY 1.8×the volume
357K200K
PCY +0.1pt
+10.1%+10.0%
PCY vs XEMD Performance
−1.5%+2.9%
- PCY 0.50%
- XEMD 0.29%, better
- PCY $1.17B
- XEMD $1.01B
- PCY −1.5%
- XEMD +2.9%, better
- PCY 6.24%
- XEMD 6.39%, better
- PCY 105
- XEMD 431
- PCY 357K sh, better
- XEMD 200K sh
- PCY $20.35
- XEMD $43.28
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PCY | XEMD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D28 | A81Higher |
| Mission | A93 | A96Higher |
| Risk | D27 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | A82 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | B65 | A75Higher |
| Durability | A82Higher | B63 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Bonds (US Dollar) funds
Same Category. PCY and XEMD are both graded against the same 17 Emerging Markets Bonds (US Dollar) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PCYB
XEMDA
In short
PCY Emerging market government bonds, all issued in dollars, drawn from 20-plus countries under a "balanced" index that aims to weight them equally rather than hand the biggest slice to the biggest borrower. Trading since 2007, pays monthly.
XEMD J.P. Morgan's flagship emerging-markets dollar-bond index with the long end trimmed off: sovereign and quasi-sovereign debt maturing inside 10 years, priced in US dollars, for 0.29% a year.
Stated mandate
PCY The fund seeks to track the DBIQ Emerging Market USD Liquid Balanced Index, which represents liquid U.S.-dollar-denominated government bonds from emerging markets. It normally invests at least 80% of assets in index securities.
XEMD The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S.-dollar-denominated emerging-market bonds with an average life below 10 years.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PCY vs XEMD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PCY vs XEMD Cost
Overpaying PCY vs XEMD
$4,027
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PCY 0.50%
$9,979
XEMD 0.29%
$5,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PCY | XEMD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $527 | $373 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $2,044 | $1,416 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $5,952 | $4,027 |
- 0.50%PCY
- 0.29%XEMD, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Bonds (US Dollar) funds
- Median 0.40%
XEMD 4th cheapest of 17 funds
PCY 11th cheapest of 17 funds
PCY vs XEMD Dividends
- PCY 6.24%
- XEMD 6.39%, better
- PCY $1.27
- XEMD $2.75
- PCY $0.11
- XEMD $0.21
- PCY Oct 19, 2026
- XEMD Nov 2, 2026
- PCY Oct 23, 2026
- XEMD Pays Nov 5, 2026
- PCY Monthly
- XEMD Monthly
Distribution history
PCY vs XEMD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PCY 10.9%XEMD 5.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PCY 0.62XEMD 1.10, better
- Worst fall
- PCY −36.0%XEMD −10.0%
- Market sensitivity
- PCY 1.59XEMD 0.64
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.