EMB ranks 3rd and PCY 10th of 17 funds in the Emerging Markets Bonds (US Dollar) Category.
EMB vs PCY
EMB −0.11pt a year
0.39%0.50%
EMB 19.2×the volume
6.87M357K
EMB +0.8pt
+2.7%+1.9%
EMB vs PCY Performance
+8.1%+4.9%
- EMB 0.39%, better
- PCY 0.50%
- EMB $13.6B
- PCY $1.17B
- EMB +0.4%, better
- PCY −1.5%
- EMB 5.81%
- PCY 6.24%, better
- EMB 621
- PCY 105
- EMB 6.87M sh, better
- PCY 357K sh
- EMB $91.92
- PCY $20.35
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EMB | PCY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B59Higher | D28 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A93 |
| Risk | C53Higher | D27 |
| Tradability | A91Higher | A82 |
| Holdings | A85Higher | B65 |
| Durability | A94Higher | A82 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Bonds (US Dollar) funds
Same Category. EMB and PCY are both graded against the same 17 Emerging Markets Bonds (US Dollar) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EMBA
PCYB
In short
EMB Emerging markets without the currency guesswork: EMB owns dollar-denominated EM debt, tracking J.P. Morgan's index since 2007. Roughly 600 bonds, income paid monthly.
PCY Emerging market government bonds, all issued in dollars, drawn from 20-plus countries under a "balanced" index that aims to weight them equally rather than hand the biggest slice to the biggest borrower. Trading since 2007, pays monthly.
Stated mandate
EMB The fund seeks to follow an index made up of U.S.-dollar-denominated bonds issued in emerging markets.
PCY The fund seeks to track the DBIQ Emerging Market USD Liquid Balanced Index, which represents liquid U.S.-dollar-denominated government bonds from emerging markets. It normally invests at least 80% of assets in index securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EMB vs PCY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EMB vs PCY Cost
Overpaying PCY vs EMB
$2,081
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EMB 0.39%
$7,898
PCY 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EMB | PCY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $900 | $195 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $3,460 | $735 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $9,979 | $2,081 |
- 0.39%EMB, cheaper
- 0.50%PCY
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Bonds (US Dollar) funds
- Median 0.40%
EMB 6th cheapest of 17 funds
PCY 11th cheapest of 17 funds
EMB vs PCY Dividends
- EMB 5.81%
- PCY 6.24%, better
- EMB $5.34
- PCY $1.27
- EMB $0.40
- PCY $0.11
- EMB Nov 2, 2026
- PCY Oct 19, 2026
- EMB Pays Nov 5, 2026
- PCY Oct 23, 2026
- EMB Monthly
- PCY Monthly
Distribution history
EMB vs PCY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EMB
- PCY
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EMB 7.3%, betterPCY 10.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- EMB 0.73, betterPCY 0.62
- Worst fall
- EMB −27.5%, betterPCY −36.0%
- Market sensitivity
- EMB 1.08PCY 1.59
EMB and PCY in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





