PDBC ranks 1st and USE 9th of 13 funds in the Commodity Futures Category.
PDBC vs USE
PDBC −0.20pt a year
0.59%0.79%
PDBC 1315.2×the volume
6.31M4.8K
USE +2.7pt
+15.5%+18.2%
PDBC vs USE Performance
+53.1%+63.6%
- PDBC 0.59%, better
- USE 0.79%
- PDBC $8.06B
- USE $3M
- PDBC +53.1%
- USE +63.6%, better
- PDBC 2.54%, better
- USE 1.76%
- PDBC 3
- USE 6
- PDBC 6.31M sh, better
- USE 4.8K sh
- PDBC $20.12
- USE $40.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PDBC | USE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A87Higher | C53 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B69Higher | D34 |
| Tradability | A90Higher | D34 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A94Higher | D26 |
Rank among Commodity Futures funds
Same Category. PDBC and USE are both graded against the same 13 Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PDBCA
USEC
In short
PDBC Broad commodity exposure without the K-1 paperwork. Trading since 2014, PDBC packages a diversified futures basket inside an ordinary fund wrapper and aims to beat its commodity benchmark rather than simply mirror it.
USE Most commodity funds hand you the whole grocery basket. USE shops one aisle: oil, petroleum and natural gas, run through derivatives with an absolute-return mandate instead of a buy-and-hold index.
Stated mandate
PDBC The fund seeks to outperform the excess-return version of its benchmark through a diversified commodity strategy.
USE The report identifies USE as a Commodity Pool Fund whose strategy is implemented primarily through commodity-linked derivatives, with subsidiary exposure used to support RIC tax requirements.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PDBC vs USE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PDBC vs USE Cost
Overpaying USE vs PDBC
$3,539
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PDBC 0.59%
$11,635
USE 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PDBC | USE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $1,405 | $347 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $5,331 | $1,280 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $15,174 | $3,539 |
- 0.59%PDBC, cheaper
- 0.79%USE
- Middle half of Commodity Futures funds
- Median 0.79%
PDBC 2nd cheapest of 13 funds
USE 7th cheapest of 13 funds
PDBC vs USE Dividends
- PDBC 2.54%, better
- USE 1.76%
- PDBC $0.51
- USE $0.70
- PDBC $0.51
- USE $0.70
- PDBC Dec 22, 2025
- USE Dec 22, 2025
- PDBC Dec 26, 2025
- USE Dec 23, 2025
- PDBC Annual
- USE Annual
Distribution history
PDBC vs USE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PDBC 16.8%, betterUSE 34.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- PDBC 0.67, betterUSE 0.52
- Worst fall
- PDBC −27.6%USE −28.2%
- Market sensitivity
- PDBC 1.06USE 1.37
PDBC and USE in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.62%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.62%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





