Skip to content

CMDT vs USE

PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund

CMDTBNYSE Arca

USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund

USECNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

CMDT −0.14pt a year

CMDT0.65%USE0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

CMDT 13.7×the volume

CMDT65.9KUSE4.8K

3Y return · a year

USE +2.3pt

CMDT+13.3%USE+15.6%

CMDT vs USE Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+25.9%CMDT+55.2%USE

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. CMDT +25.9%. USE +55.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%40%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
CMDT 0.65%, better
USE 0.79%
Fund size
CMDT $849M
USE $3M
1Y total return
CMDT +25.9%
USE +55.2%, better
Yield (12M)
CMDT 12.30%, better
USE 1.85%
Holdings
CMDT 351
USE 5
Avg volume (30D)
CMDT 65.9K sh, better
USE 4.8K sh
NAV per share
CMDT $31.77
USE $38.07
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CMDT: Cost 61, Risk 80, Mission not scored, Tradability 51, Holdings 70, Durability 72. USE: Cost 53, Risk 39, Mission not scored, Tradability 34, Holdings not scored, Durability 26.
Pillar letters and Scores for CMDT, USE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCMDTUSE
Cost30% weightB61HigherC53
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA80HigherD39
Tradability15% weightC51HigherD34
Holdings10% weightA70Not scored
Durability5% weightA72HigherD26

Rank among Commodity Futures funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CMDT and USE are both graded against the same 13 Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Commodity Futures⁠

Category · 13 funds
See all 13 ›

CMDT ranks 4th and USE 9th of 13 funds in the Commodity Futures Category.

  1. Rank 1APDBCInvesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 83
  2. Rank 2BSOYBTeucrium Soybean FundScore 65
  3. Rank 2BWEATTeucrium Wheat FundScore 65
  4. Rank 4BCMDTPIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded FundScore 63
  5. Rank 5BUSGUSCF Gold Strategy Plus Income FundScore 62
  6. Rank 9CEVMTInvesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 40
  7. Rank 9CUSEUSCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return FundScore 40
  8. Rank 11DKCCAKraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETFScore 31

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CMDTBPIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund

USECUSCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund

In short

CMDT PIMCO took the standard commodity futures fund and added the thing it is known for: an actively managed bond portfolio sitting behind the commodity bets. The mandate is to beat the Bloomberg Commodity Index, not mirror it.

USE Most commodity funds hand you the whole grocery basket. USE shops one aisle: oil, petroleum and natural gas, run through derivatives with an absolute-return mandate instead of a buy-and-hold index.

Stated mandate

CMDT The fund aims to achieve a total return that outperforms the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return, while maintaining prudent investment management.

USE The report identifies USE as a Commodity Pool Fund whose strategy is implemented primarily through commodity-linked derivatives, with subsidiary exposure used to support RIC tax requirements.

Why people hold it

  • CMDT Active by design. The stated objective is to outperform the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return, not replicate it.
  • Two engines in one ticker: swaps, futures and commodity-linked notes for the commodity exposure, an actively managed fixed income portfolio as the collateral behind them.
  • A 1940 Act fund that routes commodity-linked exposure through a Cayman subsidiary, so holders get a 1099 rather than a partnership K-1.
  • Global commodity reach spread across roughly 300 positions, with cash distributed quarterly.
  • USE Single-theme by design. The mandate points at oil, petroleum and natural gas, not the metals-grains-energy grab bag inside diversified peers like PDBC or HARD.
  • Costs 0.79% a year, a shade under the typical commodity-futures fund and below index peers such as DBB at 0.81%.
  • Clean plumbing for a futures strategy: a commodity pool built on commodity-linked derivatives, with a subsidiary sleeve used to support RIC tax treatment.

Worth knowing

  • CMDT At 0.98% a year, it sits above cheaper index-based options in the commodity futures group such as PDBC (0.74%) and HARD (0.78%). Active management is what the premium buys.
  • Tracking is not the goal here. Manager calls can push results away from the Bloomberg Commodity Index in either direction.
  • The bond collateral sleeve brings interest rate and credit sensitivity that a plain futures-and-Treasuries commodity fund does not carry.
  • USE A small fund that trades thinly. That usually shows up as wider spreads and more attention needed on how orders get placed.
  • Energy futures move sharply in both directions, and an absolute-return label does not mute that. It sits in the lower half of its commodity-futures peer group.
  • Launched in 2023, so the operating history is short, and cash goes out at most once or twice a year rather than on a monthly rhythm.

Full CMDT profile⁠

Full USE profile⁠

CMDT vs USE Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CMDT vs USE Cost

Overpaying USE vs CMDT

$2,457

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CMDT 0.65%

    $12,717

  • USE 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CMDT 0.65%
  • USE 0.79%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530USE $15,174CMDT $12,717

Year by year

YearCMDTUSEOverpaying
10$1,163$1,405$242
20$4,440$5,331$891
30$12,717$15,174$2,457

Expense ratio

  • 0.65%CMDT, cheaper
  • 0.79%USE
  • Middle half of Commodity Futures funds
  • Median 0.79%

CMDT 6th cheapest of 13 funds

USE 7th cheapest of 13 funds

CMDT vs USE Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
CMDT 12.30%, better
USE 1.85%
Payout (12M)
CMDT $3.83
USE $0.70
Last payment
CMDT $3.20
USE $0.70
Ex-dividend
CMDT Oct 1, 2026
USE Dec 22, 2025
Paid on
CMDT Oct 5, 2026
USE Dec 23, 2025
Frequency
CMDT Quarterly
USE Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

CMDTQuarterly · 15 paymentsAll CMDT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 15 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jul 3, 2023 $0.03; Oct 2, 2023 $0.32; Dec 11, 2023 $0.03; Dec 28, 2023 $0.31; Apr 1, 2024 $0.27; Jul 1, 2024 $0.26; Oct 1, 2024 $0.76; Dec 31, 2024 $0.93; Apr 1, 2025 $0.20; Jul 1, 2025 $0.21; Oct 1, 2025 $0.21; Dec 31, 2025 $0.22; Apr 1, 2026 $0.19; Jul 1, 2026 $0.22; Oct 1, 2026 $3.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1020232026YTD
USEAnnual · 4 paymentsAll USE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Aug 28, 2023 $0.46; Dec 27, 2023 $1.06; Dec 27, 2024 $10.72; Dec 22, 2025 $0.70. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1020232026YTD

CMDT vs USE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CMDT 11.5%, betterUSE 34.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CMDT 0.83, betterUSE 0.52
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CMDT −13.2%since May 2023USE −28.2%since May 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CMDT 0.78USE 1.37

Popular comparisons

  • CMDTBvsPDBCA

    PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund · Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • USECvsPDBCA

    USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund · Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CMDTBvsSOYBB

    PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund · Teucrium Soybean Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.63%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • USECvsSOYBB

    USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund · Teucrium Soybean Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.63%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CMDTBvsWEATB

    PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund · Teucrium Wheat Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.62%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • USECvsWEATB

    USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund · Teucrium Wheat Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.62%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.