CMDT ranks 4th and USE 9th of 13 funds in the Commodity Futures Category.
CMDT vs USE
CMDT −0.14pt a year
0.65%0.79%
CMDT 13.7×the volume
65.9K4.8K
USE +2.3pt
+13.3%+15.6%
CMDT vs USE Performance
+25.9%+55.2%
- CMDT 0.65%, better
- USE 0.79%
- CMDT $849M
- USE $3M
- CMDT +25.9%
- USE +55.2%, better
- CMDT 12.30%, better
- USE 1.85%
- CMDT 351
- USE 5
- CMDT 65.9K sh, better
- USE 4.8K sh
- CMDT $31.77
- USE $38.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CMDT | USE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B61Higher | C53 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A80Higher | D39 |
| Tradability | C51Higher | D34 |
| Holdings | A70 | |
| Durability | A72Higher | D26 |
Rank among Commodity Futures funds
Same Category. CMDT and USE are both graded against the same 13 Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CMDTB
USEC
In short
CMDT PIMCO took the standard commodity futures fund and added the thing it is known for: an actively managed bond portfolio sitting behind the commodity bets. The mandate is to beat the Bloomberg Commodity Index, not mirror it.
USE Most commodity funds hand you the whole grocery basket. USE shops one aisle: oil, petroleum and natural gas, run through derivatives with an absolute-return mandate instead of a buy-and-hold index.
Stated mandate
CMDT The fund aims to achieve a total return that outperforms the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return, while maintaining prudent investment management.
USE The report identifies USE as a Commodity Pool Fund whose strategy is implemented primarily through commodity-linked derivatives, with subsidiary exposure used to support RIC tax requirements.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CMDT vs USE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CMDT vs USE Cost
Overpaying USE vs CMDT
$2,457
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CMDT 0.65%
$12,717
USE 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CMDT | USE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $1,405 | $242 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $5,331 | $891 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $15,174 | $2,457 |
- 0.65%CMDT, cheaper
- 0.79%USE
- Middle half of Commodity Futures funds
- Median 0.79%
CMDT 6th cheapest of 13 funds
USE 7th cheapest of 13 funds
CMDT vs USE Dividends
- CMDT 12.30%, better
- USE 1.85%
- CMDT $3.83
- USE $0.70
- CMDT $3.20
- USE $0.70
- CMDT Oct 1, 2026
- USE Dec 22, 2025
- CMDT Oct 5, 2026
- USE Dec 23, 2025
- CMDT Quarterly
- USE Annual
Distribution history
CMDT vs USE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CMDT 11.5%, betterUSE 34.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- CMDT 0.83, betterUSE 0.52
- Worst fall
- CMDT −13.2%USE −28.2%
- Market sensitivity
- CMDT 0.78USE 1.37
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.62%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.62%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.