Skip to content

USE vs WEAT

USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund

USECNYSE Arca

Teucrium Wheat Fund

WEATBNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

WEAT −0.17pt a year

USE0.79%WEAT0.62%

Avg volume · 30D

WEAT 112.1×the volume

USE4.8KWEAT538K

3Y return · a year

USE +26.0pt

USE+18.2%WEAT−7.8%

USE vs WEAT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+63.6%USE+4.7%WEAT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. USE +63.6%. WEAT +4.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.20%40%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
USE 0.79%
WEAT 0.62%, better
Fund size
USE $3M
WEAT $234M
1Y total return
USE +63.6%, better
WEAT +4.7%
Yield (12M)
USE 1.76%
WEAT No data
Holdings
USE 6
WEAT 31
Avg volume (30D)
USE 4.8K sh
WEAT 538K sh, better
NAV per share
USE $40.21
WEAT $22.21
52W range

ETF.net Grade

USE: Cost 53, Risk 34, Mission not scored, Tradability 34, Holdings not scored, Durability 26. WEAT: Cost 76, Risk 26, Mission not scored, Tradability 84, Holdings not scored, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for USE, WEAT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarUSEWEAT
Cost30% weightC53A76Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD34HigherD26
Tradability15% weightD34A84Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightD26B61Higher

Rank among Commodity Futures funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. USE and WEAT are both graded against the same 13 Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Commodity Futures⁠

Category · 13 funds
See all 13 ›

WEAT ranks 2nd and USE 9th of 13 funds in the Commodity Futures Category.

  1. Rank 1APDBCInvesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 84
  2. Rank 2BSOYBTeucrium Soybean FundScore 65
  3. Rank 2BWEATTeucrium Wheat FundScore 65
  4. Rank 4BCMDTPIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded FundScore 64
  5. Rank 9CEVMTInvesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 9CUSEUSCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return FundScore 40
  7. Rank 11DKCCAKraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETFScore 29

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

USECUSCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund

WEATBTeucrium Wheat Fund

In short

USE Most commodity funds hand you the whole grocery basket. USE shops one aisle: oil, petroleum and natural gas, run through derivatives with an absolute-return mandate instead of a buy-and-hold index.

WEAT Wheat, straight up. Since 2011 this Teucrium fund has given brokerage-account investors pure-play exposure to CBOT wheat futures, laddered across three contract months rather than piled into the front month.

Stated mandate

USE The report identifies USE as a Commodity Pool Fund whose strategy is implemented primarily through commodity-linked derivatives, with subsidiary exposure used to support RIC tax requirements.

WEAT The fund seeks cost-effective price exposure to the wheat market through futures for future delivery.

Why people hold it

  • USE Single-theme by design. The mandate points at oil, petroleum and natural gas, not the metals-grains-energy grab bag inside diversified peers like PDBC or HARD.
  • Costs 0.79% a year, a shade under the typical commodity-futures fund and below index peers such as DBB at 0.81%.
  • Clean plumbing for a futures strategy: a commodity pool built on commodity-linked derivatives, with a subsidiary sleeve used to support RIC tax treatment.
  • WEAT Costs 0.62% a year, under the typical fee for futures-based commodity funds. Cheap matters most when the thing you own throws off no income.
  • The benchmark splits across three CBOT contracts: 35% second-to-expire, 30% third-to-expire, 35% the following December. Roll risk gets spread down the curve, not stacked on one month.teucrium.com
  • Wheat exposure without a futures account: no margin posting, no roll management, no contract expiries on your calendar. Buy it like a stock, sell it like a stock.teucrium.com
  • Among futures-based commodity funds, one of the stronger overall packages on cost and structure.

Worth knowing

  • USE A small fund that trades thinly. That usually shows up as wider spreads and more attention needed on how orders get placed.
  • Energy futures move sharply in both directions, and an absolute-return label does not mute that. It sits in the lower half of its commodity-futures peer group.
  • Launched in 2023, so the operating history is short, and cash goes out at most once or twice a year rather than on a monthly rhythm.
  • WEAT It is a commodity pool taxed as a partnership, so shareholders get a Schedule K-1 with Section 1256 treatment (60% long-term, 40% short-term), not a 1099.teucrium.com
  • The fund tracks wheat futures, not the spot price. When the curve slopes against you, returns can drift from the wheat headlines you read.teucrium.com
  • One crop, one market, and weather sets the price. Swings here run hot compared with diversified commodity baskets, and the fund is built for price exposure, not income.

Full USE profile⁠

Full WEAT profile⁠

USE vs WEAT Holdings

How USE and WEAT differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of USE and 0.0% of WEAT.

Level by level

  • Asset classAlternatives, Commodities0.0%
  • Holdings0 in both0.0%

Sector

No Sector split for USE and WEAT.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for USE.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • USE112.8%
  • WEAT83.8%

Securities held

  • USE2
  • WEAT27

Asset class

USE
Alternatives
WEAT
Commodities

Holdings

  • Only in USE2
  • In both0
  • Only in WEAT27

Only in USE

2 securities, 14.7% of USE by weight

  • NATURAL GAS FUTR Oct2713.68%
  • Micro WTI Crude F Jan271.02%

Only in WEAT

27 securities, 46.6% of WEAT by weight

  • Goldman Sachs Financial Square Government Fund 12/31/203120.03%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20372.64%
  • Admacm 09/01/20992.47%

Weight gaps

USE and WEAT share no securities.

All 32 USE holdings⁠All 32 WEAT holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

USE vs WEAT Cost

Overpaying USE vs WEAT

$2,995

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • USE 0.79%

    $15,174

  • WEAT 0.62%

    $12,179

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • USE 0.79%
  • WEAT 0.62%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530USE $15,174WEAT $12,179

Year by year

YearUSEWEATOverpaying
10$1,405$1,111$294
20$5,331$4,246$1,085
30$15,174$12,179$2,995

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%USE
  • 0.62%WEAT, cheaper
  • Middle half of Commodity Futures funds
  • Median 0.79%

WEAT 4th cheapest of 13 funds

USE 7th cheapest of 13 funds

USE vs WEAT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
USE 1.76%
WEAT No data
Payout (12M)
USE $0.70
WEAT None
Last payment
USE $0.70
WEAT No data
Ex-dividend
USE Dec 22, 2025
WEAT No data
Paid on
USE Dec 23, 2025
WEAT No data
Frequency
USE Annual
WEAT No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

USEAnnual · 4 paymentsAll USE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Aug 28, 2023 $0.46; Dec 27, 2023 $1.06; Dec 27, 2024 $10.72; Dec 22, 2025 $0.70. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1020232026YTD
WEATAll WEAT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

USE vs WEAT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
USE 34.5%WEAT 22.0%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
USE 0.52, betterWEAT −0.46
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
USE −28.2%since May 2023WEAT −67.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
USE 1.37WEAT 0.68

USE and WEAT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • USECvsPDBCA

    USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund · Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WEATBvsPDBCA

    Teucrium Wheat Fund · Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.62% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • USECvsSOYBB

    USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund · Teucrium Soybean Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.63%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WEATBvsSOYBB

    Teucrium Wheat Fund · Teucrium Soybean Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.62% · 0.63%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • USECvsCMDTB

    USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund · PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WEATBvsCMDTB

    Teucrium Wheat Fund · PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.62% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.