PDBC ranks 1st and USG 5th of 13 funds in the Commodity Futures Category.
PDBC vs USG
USG −0.14pt a year
0.59%0.45%
PDBC 1492.8×the volume
6.31M4.23K
USG +3.9pt
+15.5%+19.4%
PDBC vs USG Performance
+53.1%−6.4%
- PDBC 0.59%
- USG 0.45%, better
- PDBC $8.06B
- USG $9M
- PDBC +53.1%, better
- USG −6.4%
- PDBC 2.54%
- USG 32.00%, better
- PDBC 3
- USG 3
- PDBC 6.31M sh, better
- USG 4.23K sh
- PDBC $20.12
- USG $29.84
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PDBC | USG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A87 | A99Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B69Higher | D32 |
| Tradability | A90Higher | D27 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A94Higher | D39 |
Rank among Commodity Futures funds
Same Category. PDBC and USG are both graded against the same 13 Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PDBCA
USGB
In short
PDBC Broad commodity exposure without the K-1 paperwork. Trading since 2014, PDBC packages a diversified futures basket inside an ordinary fund wrapper and aims to beat its commodity benchmark rather than simply mirror it.
USG Gold with a paycheck attached. USG holds claims on real gold bars plus collateralized futures, sells call options against that gold, and distributes quarterly, at one of the lowest fees in the commodity-futures crowd.
Stated mandate
PDBC The fund seeks to outperform the excess-return version of its benchmark through a diversified commodity strategy.
USG The Fund seeks long-term results that generally correspond to gold-price performance while generating dividend income from selling gold call options and collateral interest. It obtains gold exposure through gold warrants, collateralized futures, and related derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PDBC vs USG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PDBC vs USG Cost
Overpaying PDBC vs USG
$2,594
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PDBC 0.59%
$11,635
USG 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PDBC | USG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $812 | $246 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $3,128 | $923 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $9,041 | $2,594 |
- 0.59%PDBC
- 0.45%USG, cheaper
- Middle half of Commodity Futures funds
- Median 0.79%
USG cheapest of 13 funds
PDBC 2nd cheapest of 13 funds
PDBC vs USG Dividends
- PDBC 2.54%
- USG 32.00%, better
- PDBC $0.51
- USG $9.52
- PDBC $0.51
- USG $0.17
- PDBC Dec 22, 2025
- USG Sep 21, 2026
- PDBC Dec 26, 2025
- USG Sep 23, 2026
- PDBC Annual
- USG Quarterly
Distribution history
PDBC vs USG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PDBC 16.8%, betterUSG 17.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- PDBC 0.67USG 0.87, better
- Worst fall
- PDBC −27.6%USG −28.8%
- Market sensitivity
- PDBC 1.06USG 0.28
PDBC and USG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.62%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.62%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





