SOYB ranks 2nd and USG 5th of 13 funds in the Commodity Futures Category.
SOYB vs USG
USG −0.18pt a year
0.63%0.45%
SOYB 16.3×the volume
68.9K4.23K
USG +21.0pt
−1.6%+19.4%
SOYB vs USG Performance
+13.0%−6.4%
- SOYB 0.63%
- USG 0.45%, better
- SOYB $39M
- USG $9M
- SOYB +13.0%, better
- USG −6.4%
- SOYB
- USG 32.00%
- SOYB 12
- USG 3
- SOYB 68.9K sh, better
- USG 4.23K sh
- SOYB $26.14
- USG $29.84
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SOYB | USG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B69 | A99Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B56Higher | D32 |
| Tradability | A76Higher | D27 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C49Higher | D39 |
Rank among Commodity Futures funds
Same Category. SOYB and USG are both graded against the same 13 Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SOYBB
USGB
In short
SOYB Soybeans, straight up. Since 2011 SOYB has tracked a benchmark of soybean futures for future delivery, wrapped so you can buy the bean in an ordinary brokerage account, and it charges less than the typical commodity futures fund.
USG Gold with a paycheck attached. USG holds claims on real gold bars plus collateralized futures, sells call options against that gold, and distributes quarterly, at one of the lowest fees in the commodity-futures crowd.
Stated mandate
SOYB SOYB seeks to track daily changes in the soybean market for future delivery through its benchmark.
USG The Fund seeks long-term results that generally correspond to gold-price performance while generating dividend income from selling gold call options and collateral interest. It obtains gold exposure through gold warrants, collateralized futures, and related derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SOYB vs USG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SOYB vs USG Cost
Overpaying SOYB vs USG
$3,318
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SOYB 0.63%
$12,359
USG 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SOYB | USG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,128 | $812 | $316 |
| 20 | $4,311 | $3,128 | $1,183 |
| 30 | $12,359 | $9,041 | $3,318 |
- 0.63%SOYB
- 0.45%USG, cheaper
- Middle half of Commodity Futures funds
- Median 0.79%
USG cheapest of 13 funds
SOYB 5th cheapest of 13 funds
SOYB vs USG Dividends
- SOYB
- USG 32.00%
- SOYB None
- USG $9.52
- SOYB
- USG $0.17
- SOYB
- USG Sep 21, 2026
- SOYB
- USG Sep 23, 2026
- SOYB
- USG Quarterly
Distribution history
SOYB vs USG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SOYB 15.1%, betterUSG 17.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- SOYB −0.33USG 0.87, better
- Worst fall
- SOYB −31.0%USG −28.8%
- Market sensitivity
- SOYB 0.44USG 0.28
SOYB and USG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.63% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.62%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.62%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


